Round 1 — BAM Day 2
29 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 1 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHINA SENIOR | RIAD | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | INDIA SENIORS | PORTO | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | 4JACKS | KUWAIT | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | AUPALETI | PORTUCOLE | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | POLAND MIXED | ALICE | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | 4FUN | GERMANY MIXED | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | SANTOSHA | AUSTRIA | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CANADA MIXED | POLAND WOMEN | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | DRINTEAM | ULI | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | GILLIS | FRANCE SENIORS | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | COME TO HK CHINA | FRANCE WOMEN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SWEDEN SENIOR | PIERCE | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | LAWRENZO | PARTYPACK | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | USA E GETTA | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | INDIA MIXED | OUJDA1 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | NZ OPEN | REASON | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MO ROCCO | RABONO CALAMIS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | INDIA OPEN | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | GEMIGNANI | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | EL GHRARI | NO COKE | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | BRENO | MASARAHLOU | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | MEXICO | NORWAY SENIOR | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | MADRID | CAMELS | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | POWERSHARK | THE DARK KNIGHT | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | NZ MIXED | INDIA WOMEN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | POLAND OPEN | DINKIN | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | TEAM BLACK | USA WOMEN | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | UAE MIXED | VINCIGUERRA | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | BV WALDSOLMS | FINLAND | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 1↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 1 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R1 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 65.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 2 | POLAND OPEN | 63.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 3 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 62.60 | 6.00 | 1 |
| 4 | NORWAY SENIOR | 62.00 | 6.00 | 1 |
| 5 | GERMANY MIXED | 61.00 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 6 | USA E GETTA | 60.80 | 6.00 | 1 |
| 7 | BV WALDSOLMS | 57.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 8 | EL GHRARI | 56.20 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 9 | FRANCE WOMEN | 55.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 10 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 54.20 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 11 | NZ OPEN | 54.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 12 | ALICE | 52.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 13 | GEMIGNANI | 51.00 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 13 | THE DARK KNIGHT | 51.00 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 15 | MASARAHLOU | 50.20 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 16 | CAMELS | 50.01 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 16 | CHINA SENIOR | 50.01 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 16 | GILLIS | 50.01 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 19 | POLAND WOMEN | 50.00 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 20 | LAWRENZO | 49.01 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 20 | NO COKE | 49.01 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 20 | PORTUCOLE | 49.01 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 20 | SANTOSHA | 49.01 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 20 | TEAM BLACK | 49.01 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 25 | POLAND MIXED | 49.00 | 6.00 | 1 |
| 26 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 48.20 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 27 | BRENO | 48.01 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 27 | FINLAND | 48.01 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 27 | INDIA MIXED | 48.01 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 30 | 4FUN | 48.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 30 | DRINTEAM | 48.00 | 5.00 | 1 |
| 30 | UAE MIXED | 48.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 33 | AUPALETI | 47.01 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 33 | AUSTRIA | 47.01 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 33 | DINKIN | 47.01 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 33 | INDIA OPEN | 47.01 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 33 | PARTYPACK | 47.01 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 33 | RABONO CALAMIS | 47.01 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 33 | REASON | 47.01 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 40 | USA WOMEN | 47.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 41 | FRANCE SENIORS | 46.01 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 41 | POWERSHARK | 46.01 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 43 | INDIA SENIORS | 46.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 43 | NZ MIXED | 46.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 45 | MADRID | 44.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 45 | ULI | 44.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 47 | 4JACKS | 41.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 47 | CANADA MIXED | 41.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 47 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 41.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | PORTO | 40.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 51 | MO ROCCO | 39.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 52 | INDIA WOMEN | 38.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 53 | COME TO HK CHINA | 37.20 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 54 | PIERCE | 36.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 55 | OUJDA1 | 35.80 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 56 | MEXICO | 35.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 57 | KUWAIT | 34.80 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 58 | RIAD | 32.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 1 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R1 | BAM% |
|---|
CHINA SENIOR vs RIAD 5 : 1 VP (match 115186) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA SENIOR | RIAD | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 79% | 1NT | S | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥x | S | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 75% | 4♠ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♦Q | = | 140 | 73% | 3♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.0 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | ||||
| 4♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA SENIORS vs PORTO 4 : 2 VP (match 115187) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA SENIORS | PORTO | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 92% | 2♠ | S | ♦5 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | W | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 84% | 3♠ | E | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | W | ♥3 | = | 530 | 100% | 3♠ | W | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.3 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 4♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 64% | ||||
| 3♠x | W | = | 530 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
4JACKS vs KUWAIT 4 : 2 VP (match 115188) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 4JACKS | KUWAIT | |
| 2♥ | E | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 62% | 2♥ | E | ♠2 | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2♠ | E | ♥2 | = | 110 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♥2 | = | 110 | 55% | 3♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 140 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.9 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -2 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 72% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUPALETI vs PORTUCOLE 2 : 4 VP (match 115189) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUPALETI | PORTUCOLE | |
| 2♠ | N | ♦10 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 3♣ | S | ♦5 | -4 | 200 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥9 | = | 420 | 68% | 3NT | E | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | E | ♥A | = | 140 | 73% | 1NT | S | ♠5 | = | 90 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | S | -4 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND MIXED vs ALICE 6 : 0 VP (match 115190) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND MIXED | ALICE | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 57% | 1NT | W | ♠Q | = | 90 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣6 | = | 420 | 68% | 4♠ | E | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♠7 | = | 90 | 85% | 2♠ | W | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.8 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 69% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 97% | ||||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
4FUN vs GERMANY MIXED 1 : 5 VP (match 115191) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 4FUN | GERMANY MIXED | |
| 2♥ | E | ♠7 | = | 110 | 86% | 2♥ | E | ♠3 | = | 110 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 97% | 4♠ | E | ♣2 | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 140 | 73% | 2♠ | E | ♥7 | = | 110 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-2.1 | NS-1.0 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-2.1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SANTOSHA vs AUSTRIA 4 : 2 VP (match 115192) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SANTOSHA | AUSTRIA | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2♠ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 84% | 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♠3 | = | 90 | 85% | 3♠ | W | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.8 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CANADA MIXED vs POLAND WOMEN 1 : 5 VP (match 115193) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CANADA MIXED | POLAND WOMEN | |
| 2♥ | E | ♦Q | = | 110 | 86% | 2♠ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 68% | 2♣x | S | ♥10 | = | 180 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | E | ♥A | = | 140 | 73% | 3♠ | W | ♥2 | = | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+1.0 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2♣x | S | = | 180 | 95% | ||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs ULI 5 : 1 VP (match 115194) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | ULI | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 79% | 2♥ | E | ♠7 | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 68% | 4♠ | W | ♥4 | = | 420 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠x | W | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 89% | 3♠ | W | ♥5 | = | 140 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-1.7 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 4♠x | W | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GILLIS vs FRANCE SENIORS 5 : 1 VP (match 115195) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GILLIS | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 2♠ | N | ♦10 | -1 | 50 | 57% | 3♠ | N | ♦10 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥x | N | ♦J | = | 590 | 98% | 5♥x | S | ♠K | -2 | 300 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♣8 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 3♥ | S | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.0 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 4♥x | N | = | 590 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 58% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
COME TO HK CHINA vs FRANCE WOMEN 2 : 4 VP (match 115196) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | COME TO HK CHINA | FRANCE WOMEN | |
| 3♥ | W | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 62% | 3♦ | S | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 450 | 97% | 4♠ | E | ♣4 | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠ | W | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWEDEN SENIOR vs PIERCE 6 : 0 VP (match 115197) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWEDEN SENIOR | PIERCE | |
| 3♥ | W | ♥3 | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2♥ | W | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 130 | 69% | 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2♠ | E | ♥A | +1 | 140 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-1.7 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 2♦ | W | +2 | 130 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAWRENZO vs PARTYPACK 4 : 2 VP (match 115198) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAWRENZO | PARTYPACK | |
| 3♥ | W | ♠K | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2♥ | W | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♥4 | = | 420 | 68% | 4♥x | S | ♠K | +1 | 690 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♥Q | = | 110 | 55% | 2♠ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 140 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.8 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | +1 | 690 | 100% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIEDS NOIR AND CO vs USA E GETTA 0 : 6 VP (match 115199) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | USA E GETTA | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2♠ | N | ♦10 | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 68% | 4♥x | N | ♦J | -2 | 300 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♥3 | +2 | 170 | 97% | 3♠ | W | ♥5 | = | 140 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.3 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 79% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 58% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA MIXED vs OUJDA1 3 : 3 VP (match 115396) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA MIXED | OUJDA1 | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦7 | = | 110 | 79% | 1NT | S | ♥7 | = | 90 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♥4 | = | 420 | 68% | 5♥x | N | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 140 | 73% | 3♠ | W | ♥5 | = | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 55% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | N | -1 | 100 | 75% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NZ OPEN vs REASON 4 : 2 VP (match 115397) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NZ OPEN | REASON | |
| 3♥ | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 62% | 3♦ | S | ♦5 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 68% | 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 140 | 73% | 2♠ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MO ROCCO vs RABONO CALAMIS 4 : 2 VP (match 115398) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MO ROCCO | RABONO CALAMIS | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣7 | +1 | 170 | 98% | 3♥ | W | ♦A | = | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 170 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♠3 | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♦7 | = | 620 | 99% | 3♠ | W | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | W | = | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA OPEN vs CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115399) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA OPEN | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 79% | 2NT | S | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 170 | 64% | 4♦x | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 140 | 73% | 4♥ | S | ♦7 | = | 620 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.7 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MATILDAS PLUS 2 vs GEMIGNANI 1 : 5 VP (match 115400) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | GEMIGNANI | |
| 2♥ | E | ♠3 | = | 110 | 86% | 3♥ | E | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥2 | = | 90 | 77% | 2♣ | S | ♥10 | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 73% | 3♠ | W | ♥2 | = | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | S | -1 | 50 | 79% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EL GHRARI vs NO COKE 2 : 4 VP (match 115401) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EL GHRARI | NO COKE | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2♠ | S | ♦6 | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 84% | 3♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 170 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 140 | 73% | 3♠ | E | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | ||||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 64% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs MASARAHLOU 3 : 3 VP (match 115402) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | MASARAHLOU | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 79% | 2♠ | S | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♠3 | = | 420 | 68% | 4♠ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 55% | 1NT | S | ♠3 | = | 90 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MEXICO vs NORWAY SENIOR 0 : 6 VP (match 115403) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MEXICO | NORWAY SENIOR | |
| 1NT | S | ♦7 | = | 90 | 55% | 2♠ | S | ♦7 | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 68% | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♥2 | = | 140 | 73% | 2♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MADRID vs CAMELS 1 : 5 VP (match 115404) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MADRID | CAMELS | |
| 3♦ | S | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2♠ | N | ♦10 | -1 | 50 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 97% | 4♠ | W | ♠2 | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 3♥ | S | ♠3 | = | 140 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 57% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POWERSHARK vs THE DARK KNIGHT 1 : 5 VP (match 115405) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POWERSHARK | THE DARK KNIGHT | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 79% | 2♠x | N | ♠6 | = | 470 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 450 | 97% | 4♠ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 73% | 2♠ | W | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | N | = | 470 | 100% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NZ MIXED vs INDIA WOMEN 2 : 4 VP (match 115406) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NZ MIXED | INDIA WOMEN | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 79% | 2♥ | E | ♠3 | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣6 | = | 420 | 68% | 4♠ | W | ♥4 | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 140 | 73% | 3♥ | S | ♦7 | = | 140 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND OPEN vs DINKIN 4 : 2 VP (match 115407) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND OPEN | DINKIN | |
| 1NT | W | ♦A | = | 90 | 69% | 2♠ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♠K | = | 420 | 97% | 4♠ | E | ♠3 | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦7 | = | 140 | 93% | 2♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM BLACK vs USA WOMEN 4 : 2 VP (match 115408) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM BLACK | USA WOMEN | |
| 2♠ | S | ♠4 | +1 | 140 | 92% | 2NT | S | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥x | N | ♦J | -2 | 300 | 58% | 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♠5 | -3 | 300 | 98% | 3♥ | S | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | ||||
| 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 1NT | S | -3 | 300 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UAE MIXED vs VINCIGUERRA 2 : 4 VP (match 115409) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UAE MIXED | VINCIGUERRA | |
| 2♥ | E | ♠3 | +1 | 140 | 94% | 3♥ | E | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♣A | +1 | 130 | 69% | 4♠ | E | ♥9 | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♦2 | +1 | 140 | 73% | 3♥ | S | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BV WALDSOLMS vs FINLAND 3 : 3 VP (match 115410) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BV WALDSOLMS | FINLAND | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦5 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2♠ | N | ♥5 | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 68% | 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | S | ♦7 | +1 | 170 | 97% | 2♠ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 140 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 79% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 68% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
Board 16board records → · view →
| ♠ KQ95 ♥ 63 ♦ AK3 ♣ J653 | ||
| ♠ AT4 ♥ AT87 ♦ 7654 ♣ A8 | 16 Dlr W E-W | ♠ J86 ♥ KJ95 ♦ T9 ♣ Q942 |
| ♠ 732 ♥ Q42 ♦ QJ82 ♣ KT7 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| S | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| E | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| W | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
Minimax (par): NS -100: 2♠Nx-1 2♠Sx-1
Board 17board records → · view →
| ♠ 7642 ♥ Q7654 ♦ 986 ♣ A | ||
| ♠ KQT8 ♥ T ♦ KQ5432 ♣ 53 | 17 Dlr N None | ♠ AJ95 ♥ A83 ♦ JT ♣ QT98 |
| ♠ 3 ♥ KJ92 ♦ A7 ♣ KJ7642 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 6 |
| S | 3 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 6 |
| E | 6 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 5 |
| W | 6 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 5 |
Minimax (par): NS -100: 5♥Nx-1 5♥Sx-1
Board 18board records → · view →
| ♠ J2 ♥ Q532 ♦ QJ62 ♣ 543 | ||
| ♠ Q8753 ♥ K9 ♦ 74 ♣ KJ87 | 18 Dlr E N-S | ♠ A64 ♥ J6 ♦ AT953 ♣ Q92 |
| ♠ KT9 ♥ AT874 ♦ K8 ♣ AT6 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| S | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| E | 6 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| W | 6 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
Minimax (par): NS -140: 2♠E+1 2♠W+1