Round 8 — BAM Day 2
29 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 8 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CANADA MIXED | RIAD | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | DRINTEAM | SANTOSHA | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | GILLIS | 4FUN | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | COME TO HK CHINA | POLAND MIXED | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | SWEDEN SENIOR | AUPALETI | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | LAWRENZO | 4JACKS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | INDIA SENIORS | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | USA E GETTA | CHINA SENIOR | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PARTYPACK | PORTO | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PIERCE | KUWAIT | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | FRANCE WOMEN | PORTUCOLE | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | FRANCE SENIORS | ALICE | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | ULI | GERMANY MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | POLAND WOMEN | AUSTRIA | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | MEXICO | OUJDA1 | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | MADRID | BRENO | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | POWERSHARK | EL GHRARI | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | NZ MIXED | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | POLAND OPEN | INDIA OPEN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | TEAM BLACK | MO ROCCO | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | UAE MIXED | NZ OPEN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | BV WALDSOLMS | INDIA MIXED | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | FINLAND | REASON | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | VINCIGUERRA | RABONO CALAMIS | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | USA WOMEN | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | DINKIN | GEMIGNANI | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | INDIA WOMEN | NO COKE | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | THE DARK KNIGHT | MASARAHLOU | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | CAMELS | NORWAY SENIOR | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 8↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 8 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R8 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND OPEN | 92.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 2 | VINCIGUERRA | 89.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 3 | GERMANY MIXED | 85.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 4 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 84.60 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 5 | USA E GETTA | 83.80 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 6 | BV WALDSOLMS | 82.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 7 | GEMIGNANI | 80.00 | 6.00 | 8 |
| 8 | NORWAY SENIOR | 79.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 9 | EL GHRARI | 78.20 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 10 | POLAND MIXED | 77.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 11 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 76.20 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 12 | FRANCE WOMEN | 76.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 13 | NZ OPEN | 75.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 14 | ALICE | 74.50 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 15 | FRANCE SENIORS | 74.01 | 5.00 | 8 |
| 15 | GILLIS | 74.01 | 5.00 | 8 |
| 15 | INDIA OPEN | 74.01 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 18 | NO COKE | 73.01 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 18 | PORTUCOLE | 73.01 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 18 | TEAM BLACK | 73.01 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 21 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 72.20 | 5.00 | 8 |
| 22 | CAMELS | 72.01 | 5.00 | 8 |
| 23 | THE DARK KNIGHT | 72.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 24 | AUPALETI | 71.01 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 24 | BRENO | 71.01 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 24 | INDIA MIXED | 71.01 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 24 | LAWRENZO | 71.01 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 28 | POLAND WOMEN | 71.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 29 | RABONO CALAMIS | 70.01 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 29 | REASON | 70.01 | 6.00 | 8 |
| 31 | INDIA SENIORS | 70.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 32 | SANTOSHA | 69.01 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 33 | DRINTEAM | 69.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 34 | MASARAHLOU | 68.20 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 35 | CHINA SENIOR | 68.01 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 35 | PARTYPACK | 68.01 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 37 | 4JACKS | 68.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 37 | UAE MIXED | 68.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 39 | DINKIN | 67.01 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 40 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 67.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 41 | POWERSHARK | 66.01 | 5.00 | 8 |
| 42 | AUSTRIA | 64.01 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 42 | FINLAND | 64.01 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 44 | 4FUN | 64.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 44 | MADRID | 64.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 44 | ULI | 64.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 44 | USA WOMEN | 64.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 48 | NZ MIXED | 62.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 49 | CANADA MIXED | 58.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 50 | MO ROCCO | 57.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 51 | COME TO HK CHINA | 56.20 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 52 | PORTO | 54.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 53 | MEXICO | 53.00 | 6.00 | 8 |
| 54 | INDIA WOMEN | 52.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 54 | RIAD | 52.00 | 5.00 | 8 |
| 56 | PIERCE | 50.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 57 | KUWAIT | 48.80 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 58 | OUJDA1 | 41.80 | 0.00 | 8 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 8 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R8 | BAM% |
|---|
CANADA MIXED vs RIAD 1 : 5 VP (match 115284) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CANADA MIXED | RIAD | |
| 3♣ | S | ♥2 | -6 | 600 | 51% | 3♣ | E | ♦3 | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | S | ♠Q | +3 | 200 | 58% | 3NT | N | ♣7 | = | 400 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | S | -6 | 600 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | +2 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs SANTOSHA 4 : 2 VP (match 115285) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | SANTOSHA | |
| 4♥ | W | ♣3 | = | 620 | 64% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | E | ♥8 | +2 | 200 | 78% | 5♥x | S | ♠Q | -3 | 500 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 170 | 68% | 1♦ | S | ♠Q | +2 | 110 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.9 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 51% | ||||
| 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 99% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1♦ | S | +2 | 110 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GILLIS vs 4FUN 5 : 1 VP (match 115286) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GILLIS | 4FUN | |
| 5♣ | E | ♦4 | = | 600 | 51% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠ | E | ♥9 | = | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | N | ♥2 | +1 | 450 | 93% | 1♠ | N | ♣3 | +2 | 140 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.4 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 5♠ | E | = | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | N | +2 | 140 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
COME TO HK CHINA vs POLAND MIXED 4 : 2 VP (match 115287) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | COME TO HK CHINA | POLAND MIXED | |
| 4♣ | W | ♠Q | = | 130 | 82% | 4♣ | E | ♦3 | +1 | 150 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♥x | S | ♠Q | -2 | 300 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♥Q | = | 400 | 81% | 2♥ | N | ♠J | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.1 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | W | = | 130 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | E | +1 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 75% | ||||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | +3 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWEDEN SENIOR vs AUPALETI 3 : 3 VP (match 115288) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWEDEN SENIOR | AUPALETI | |
| 3NT | W | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6♣ | E | ♦4 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 4♠ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | N | ♣3 | +2 | 170 | 68% | 3NT | N | ♠6 | = | 400 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAWRENZO vs 4JACKS 4 : 2 VP (match 115289) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAWRENZO | 4JACKS | |
| 5♣ | E | ♦4 | = | 600 | 51% | 3♦ | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♠Q | -2 | 100 | 82% | 4♠ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | N | ♠2 | +2 | 180 | 60% | 1♦ | N | ♠2 | +3 | 130 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 88% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 2NT | N | +2 | 180 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 1♦ | N | +3 | 130 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIEDS NOIR AND CO vs INDIA SENIORS 3 : 3 VP (match 115290) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | INDIA SENIORS | |
| 5♣ | W | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 92% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2NT | N | ♠2 | = | 120 | 92% | 3NT | N | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA E GETTA vs CHINA SENIOR 2 : 4 VP (match 115291) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA E GETTA | CHINA SENIOR | |
| 3NT | E | ♠4 | = | 600 | 51% | 3♦x | N | ♥A | = | 670 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 5♣ | E | ♦4 | = | 400 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♠2 | +1 | 430 | 88% | 2♥ | N | ♣3 | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+1.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | N | = | 670 | 99% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | E | = | 400 | 73% | ||||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | +3 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PARTYPACK vs PORTO 3 : 3 VP (match 115292) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PARTYPACK | PORTO | |
| 4♥ | E | ♦4 | +2 | 680 | 91% | 5♣ | W | ♦A | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥9 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | S | ♥3 | +2 | 200 | 58% | 1♠ | N | ♣3 | +2 | 140 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 680 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | W | = | 600 | 51% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | +2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | N | +2 | 140 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIERCE vs KUWAIT 2 : 4 VP (match 115293) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIERCE | KUWAIT | |
| 2NT | W | ♦10 | +4 | 240 | 61% | 4♣ | E | ♦4 | = | 130 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠ | E | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 3♣ | E | ♦4 | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | N | ♣4 | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2NT | N | ♠2 | +3 | 210 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+1.7 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2NT | W | +4 | 240 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | E | = | 130 | 82% | ||||
| 6♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | +2 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | N | +3 | 210 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE WOMEN vs PORTUCOLE 2 : 4 VP (match 115294) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE WOMEN | PORTUCOLE | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 620 | 64% | 3NT | W | ♦2 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 3♠ | E | ♣3 | +2 | 200 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | N | ♣3 | +3 | 170 | 68% | 2NT | N | ♠2 | +2 | 180 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 78% | ||||
| 1♠ | N | +3 | 170 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | N | +2 | 180 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs ALICE 5 : 1 VP (match 115295) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | ALICE | |
| 3♣ | E | ♣Q | +1 | 130 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | S | ♣2 | +1 | 450 | 93% | 3♥ | N | ♠6 | +2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.6 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | E | +1 | 130 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | +2 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ULI vs GERMANY MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115296) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ULI | GERMANY MIXED | |
| 3♣ | E | ♥8 | +2 | 150 | 70% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 3NT | W | ♥10 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | N | ♠6 | +2 | 200 | 58% | 3NT | N | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+1.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | E | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | +2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND WOMEN vs AUSTRIA 2 : 4 VP (match 115297) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND WOMEN | AUSTRIA | |
| 3NT | W | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 5♣ | W | ♦A | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♦3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♥5 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | N | ♠6 | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2♥ | N | ♣4 | +3 | 200 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | W | = | 600 | 51% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +3 | 200 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +3 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MEXICO vs OUJDA1 6 : 0 VP (match 115501) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MEXICO | OUJDA1 | |
| 5♣ | W | ♦A | = | 600 | 51% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 5♥x | S | ♥2 | -3 | 500 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♠2 | +1 | 430 | 88% | 2NT | N | ♣7 | +1 | 150 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-2.0 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 99% | ||||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | N | +1 | 150 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MADRID vs BRENO 3 : 3 VP (match 115502) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MADRID | BRENO | |
| 3♣ | E | ♦Q | +2 | 150 | 70% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +3 | 690 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥J | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1♦ | N | ♣3 | +2 | 110 | 97% | 3♥ | N | ♠6 | +2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | E | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 97% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 1♦ | N | +2 | 110 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | +2 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POWERSHARK vs EL GHRARI 5 : 1 VP (match 115503) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POWERSHARK | EL GHRARI | |
| 3♣ | E | ♦3 | +2 | 150 | 70% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +3 | 690 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | S | ♣2 | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2NT | N | ♠6 | = | 120 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-2.0 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | E | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 97% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NZ MIXED vs MATILDAS PLUS 2 2 : 4 VP (match 115504) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NZ MIXED | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | |
| 3♦x | N | ♥A | = | 670 | 99% | 4♣ | E | ♦3 | +1 | 150 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥8 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 6♣ | E | ♦4 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 1♦ | N | ♦4 | +3 | 130 | 85% | 2NT | N | ♠6 | +1 | 150 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦x | N | = | 670 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | E | +1 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | ||||
| 1♦ | N | +3 | 130 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | N | +1 | 150 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND OPEN vs INDIA OPEN 2 : 4 VP (match 115505) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND OPEN | INDIA OPEN | |
| 3NT | W | ♦10 | +3 | 690 | 97% | 3NT | W | ♦9 | +3 | 690 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | E | ♥8 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | N | ♠6 | +3 | 200 | 58% | 3NT | N | ♣3 | +1 | 430 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 97% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM BLACK vs MO ROCCO 4 : 2 VP (match 115506) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM BLACK | MO ROCCO | |
| 4♣ | W | ♠Q | = | 130 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +3 | 690 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠ | E | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 4♠ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | N | ♠2 | +4 | 210 | 75% | 3NTx | N | ♣3 | = | 550 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | W | = | 130 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 97% | ||||
| 6♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 1NT | N | +4 | 210 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3NTx | N | = | 550 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UAE MIXED vs NZ OPEN 2 : 4 VP (match 115507) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UAE MIXED | NZ OPEN | |
| 3NT | W | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 3♣ | E | ♦4 | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 6♣ | E | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♥4 | +1 | 450 | 93% | 2NT | N | ♠7 | = | 120 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | +2 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BV WALDSOLMS vs INDIA MIXED 4 : 2 VP (match 115508) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BV WALDSOLMS | INDIA MIXED | |
| 3♣ | E | ♦3 | +2 | 150 | 70% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣ | E | ♦3 | = | 400 | 73% | 3NT | W | ♣6 | +1 | 430 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 1♦ | N | ♣4 | +3 | 130 | 85% | 2♥ | N | ♠2 | +2 | 170 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | E | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 5♣ | E | = | 400 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 69% | ||||
| 1♦ | N | +3 | 130 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINLAND vs REASON 0 : 6 VP (match 115509) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINLAND | REASON | |
| 3NT | W | ♠Q | = | 600 | 51% | 3♦ | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 5♦ | W | ♥5 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | N | ♠2 | +2 | 180 | 60% | 3♥ | S | ♣10 | +2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.9 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 88% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | W | -2 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 2NT | N | +2 | 180 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | +2 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VINCIGUERRA vs RABONO CALAMIS 3 : 3 VP (match 115510) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VINCIGUERRA | RABONO CALAMIS | |
| 5♣ | W | ♦A | = | 600 | 51% | 3♣ | E | ♦4 | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥8 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | N | ♥A | +2 | 200 | 58% | 3♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 170 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | +2 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | +2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA WOMEN vs CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED 1 : 5 VP (match 115511) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA WOMEN | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | |
| 3♦ | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 3♦ | N | ♥A | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 5♦x | W | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♠2 | = | 400 | 81% | 3NT | N | ♠2 | = | 400 | 81% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+2.5 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 95% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | W | -1 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 81% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DINKIN vs GEMIGNANI 0 : 6 VP (match 115512) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DINKIN | GEMIGNANI | |
| 3NT | W | ♠Q | = | 600 | 51% | 3♠ | W | ♣3 | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | W | ♦Q | +1 | 430 | 69% | 3NT | E | ♥3 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | N | ♠6 | +2 | 170 | 68% | 3♥ | S | ♦2 | +2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+2.0 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | +2 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA WOMEN vs NO COKE 4 : 2 VP (match 115513) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA WOMEN | NO COKE | |
| 3NT | W | ♠Q | = | 600 | 51% | 3NT | W | ♦9 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 6♣ | E | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 4♠ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | N | ♠2 | = | 120 | 92% | 3♦ | N | ♣3 | +1 | 130 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE DARK KNIGHT vs MASARAHLOU 2 : 4 VP (match 115514) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE DARK KNIGHT | MASARAHLOU | |
| 4♥ | E | ♦3 | +1 | 650 | 88% | 5♣ | W | ♦2 | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥8 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 3NT | W | ♦7 | +3 | 490 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2NT | N | ♠2 | +1 | 150 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-2.0 | NS-1.5 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | W | = | 600 | 51% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 490 | 97% | ||||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | N | +1 | 150 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-2.0 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAMELS vs NORWAY SENIOR 5 : 1 VP (match 115515) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAMELS | NORWAY SENIOR | |
| 5♣ | W | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 92% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | +2 | 660 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 3NT | W | ♦Q | +2 | 460 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | N | ♣3 | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2♥ | N | ♠6 | +3 | 200 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.5 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 89% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 95% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +3 | 200 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +3 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
Board 7board records → · view →
| ♠ QJ3 ♥ Q65 ♦ AT9872 ♣ 3 | ||
| ♠ A952 ♥ J42 ♦ K5 ♣ K986 | 7 Dlr S Both | ♠ 86 ♥ AK93 ♦ J ♣ AT7542 |
| ♠ KT74 ♥ T87 ♦ Q643 ♣ QJ |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 3 |
| S | 3 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 3 |
| E | 7 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 10 |
| W | 9 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
Minimax (par): NS -620: 4♥E= 4♥W=
Board 8board records → · view →
| ♠ J6 ♥ QT5 ♦ QJ87 ♣ A976 | ||
| ♠ Q3 ♥ 742 ♦ KT652 ♣ K85 | 8 Dlr W None | ♠ AK854 ♥ A ♦ A9 ♣ QJT42 |
| ♠ T972 ♥ KJ9863 ♦ 43 ♣ 3 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 2 |
| S | 3 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 2 |
| E | 7 | 11 | 6 | 9 | 11 |
| W | 7 | 11 | 6 | 9 | 11 |
Minimax (par): NS -450: 4♠E+1 4♠W+1
Board 9board records → · view →
| ♠ AKT9 ♥ 95 ♦ KQJ5 ♣ AQ6 | ||
| ♠ Q4 ♥ 643 ♦ 872 ♣ KJT52 | 9 Dlr N E-W | ♠ J762 ♥ AQ2 ♦ A64 ♣ 743 |
| ♠ 853 ♥ KJT87 ♦ T93 ♣ 98 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 9 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 8 |
| S | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 |
| E | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| W | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Minimax (par): NS +450: 4♥N+1