Round 1 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 1 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEMESIS | HARRIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CUNEO | PACIFIC | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | NONAME | BELL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | FRANCE SENIORS | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BRUNET | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | BRENO | MARILL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | POLAND | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 1↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 1 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R1 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEMESIS | 11.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | 9.43 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 3 | FRANCE SENIORS | 8.11 | 2.40 | 1 |
| 4 | POLAND | 7.43 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 5 | CUNEO | 6.86 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 6 | BRENO | 6.57 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 7 | NONAME | 6.29 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 8 | BRUNET | 6.14 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 9 | BELL | 5.71 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 10 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 5.29 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 11 | PACIFIC | 5.14 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 12 | MARILL | 4.86 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 13 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 14 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 2.57 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 1 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R1 | BAM% |
|---|
NEMESIS vs HARRIS 3 : 1 VP (match 34214) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | HARRIS | |
| 13 | 1NT | N | ♥3 | = | 90 | 67% | 1NT | N | ♥8 | = | 90 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 3NT | E | ♦6 | -3 | 150 | 67% | 5♣x | W | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 67% | ||||
| 14 | 3NT | E | -3 | 150 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | -1 | 100 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 34215) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 13 | 1NT | N | ♥3 | +2 | 150 | 97% | 1NT | N | ♥8 | +1 | 120 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 4♦x | E | ♥A | = | 510 | 80% | 5♦x | E | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 1NT | N | +2 | 150 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 77% | ||||
| 14 | 4♦x | E | = | 510 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs PACIFIC 0 : 4 VP (match 34216) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | PACIFIC | |
| 13 | 1NT | N | ♥3 | = | 90 | 67% | 2NT | N | ♦9 | = | 120 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 3♣x | W | ♦5 | +1 | 570 | 97% | 5♦x | E | ♥A | -4 | 800 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 77% | ||||
| 14 | 3♣x | W | +1 | 570 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | E | -4 | 800 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs BELL 0 : 4 VP (match 34217) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | BELL | |
| 13 | 1NT | N | ♦5 | +1 | 120 | 77% | 1NT | N | ♥8 | +2 | 150 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 3♣x | E | ♦5 | +1 | 570 | 97% | 3♠ | S | ♣Q | +1 | 170 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +2 | 150 | 97% | ||||
| 14 | 3♣x | E | +1 | 570 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | +1 | 170 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 34218) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | BYE | |
| 13 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| 14 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 1 : 3 VP (match 34219) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 13 | 1NT | N | ♥2 | = | 90 | 67% | 1NT | S | ♥3 | = | 90 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 5♦x | E | ♣8 | -1 | 100 | 53% | 3NT | N | ♥J | = | 400 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 67% | ||||
| 14 | 5♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs MARILL 2 : 2 VP (match 34220) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | MARILL | |
| 13 | 2♠ | N | ♦9 | = | 110 | 60% | 1NT | N | ♥7 | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 5♦x | W | ♥A | = | 550 | 87% | 5♣x | W | ♥4 | -2 | 300 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 67% | ||||
| 14 | 5♦x | W | = | 550 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs POLAND 0 : 4 VP (match 34221) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | POLAND | |
| 13 | 1NT | N | ♥8 | = | 90 | 67% | 1NT | N | ♥3 | +1 | 120 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 4♣ | W | ♠A | = | 130 | 73% | 5♣x | W | ♠A | -4 | 800 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 77% | ||||
| 14 | 4♣ | W | = | 130 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | -4 | 800 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|