Round 2 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 2 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | HARRIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CUNEO | NEMESIS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | NONAME | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | FRANCE SENIORS | PACIFIC | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BRUNET | BELL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BRENO | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | POLAND | MARILL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 2↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 2 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R2 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEMESIS | 14.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | 13.43 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 3 | POLAND | 10.43 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 4 | BELL | 9.71 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 5 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 9.29 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 6 | FRANCE SENIORS | 9.11 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 7 | BRENO | 8.97 | 2.40 | 2 |
| 8 | PACIFIC | 8.14 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 9 | CUNEO | 7.86 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 10 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 6.57 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 11 | NONAME | 6.29 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 12 | BRUNET | 6.14 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 13 | MARILL | 5.86 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 2 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R2 | BAM% |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs HARRIS 4 : 0 VP (match 34222) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | HARRIS | |
| 15 | 4♠ | N | ♥J | = | 620 | 100% | 5♦ | E | ♠3 | +1 | 420 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 3NT | E | ♦3 | +4 | 720 | 73% | 6NT | E | ♦A | = | 1440 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | E | +1 | 420 | 57% | ||||
| 16 | 3NT | E | +4 | 720 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | E | = | 1440 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs NEMESIS 1 : 3 VP (match 34223) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | NEMESIS | |
| 15 | 6♦x | W | ♣5 | = | 1090 | 90% | 5♦ | W | ♦5 | +1 | 420 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 6NT | E | ♥8 | = | 1440 | 70% | 6NT | W | ♠10 | = | 1440 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 6♦x | W | = | 1090 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | W | +1 | 420 | 57% | ||||
| 16 | 6NT | E | = | 1440 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 0 : 4 VP (match 34224) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 15 | 6♦x | E | ♦5 | +1 | 1190 | 100% | 6♦x | W | ♠A | = | 1090 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 6NT | E | ♦5 | = | 1440 | 70% | 7NTx | W | ♣10 | -1 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 6♦x | E | +1 | 1190 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 6♦x | W | = | 1090 | 90% | ||||
| 16 | 6NT | E | = | 1440 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 7NTx | W | -1 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs PACIFIC 1 : 3 VP (match 34225) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | PACIFIC | |
| 15 | 5♦x | E | ♠4 | +2 | 750 | 70% | 5♠ | N | ♥J | -2 | 200 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 6NT | W | ♣10 | = | 1440 | 70% | 6NT | E | ♦A | = | 1440 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 5♦x | E | +2 | 750 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | N | -2 | 200 | 70% | ||||
| 16 | 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | E | = | 1440 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs BELL 0 : 4 VP (match 34226) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | BELL | |
| 15 | 5♥ | E | ♦5 | +2 | 510 | 53% | 5♠x | N | ♦Q | -1 | 200 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 6NT | E | ♣10 | = | 1440 | 70% | 7NTx | W | ♠10 | -1 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 5♥ | E | +2 | 510 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 5♠x | N | -1 | 200 | 70% | ||||
| 16 | 6NT | E | = | 1440 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 7NTx | W | -1 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 34227) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | BYE | |
| 15 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+1.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| 16 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 0 : 4 VP (match 34228) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 15 | 5♥x | W | ♣5 | +1 | 750 | 70% | 5♦x | W | ♣5 | +1 | 650 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 6NT | W | ♠10 | = | 1440 | 70% | 3♣x | N | ♠A | -5 | 1100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 5♥x | W | +1 | 750 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | +1 | 650 | 60% | ||||
| 16 | 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 3♣x | N | -5 | 1100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs MARILL 3 : 1 VP (match 34229) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | MARILL | |
| 15 | 5♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 80% | 5♥x | E | ♠4 | +2 | 850 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 6NT | E | ♥2 | = | 1440 | 70% | 6NT | E | ♠5 | = | 1440 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 5♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | E | +2 | 850 | 80% | ||||
| 16 | 6NT | E | = | 1440 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | E | = | 1440 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|