Round 7 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 7 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRENO | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BRUNET | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | POLAND | FRANCE SENIORS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | MARILL | NONAME | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | CUNEO | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BYE | LUPO VELOCE | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 7 | BELL | NEMESIS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | PACIFIC | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 7↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 7 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R7 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 25.83 | 2.40 | 7 |
| 2 | NEMESIS | 21.50 | 3.00 | 7 |
| 3 | BELL | 21.11 | 1.00 | 7 |
| 3 | FRANCE SENIORS | 21.11 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 5 | BRENO | 20.97 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 6 | POLAND | 20.83 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 7 | PACIFIC | 19.14 | 3.00 | 7 |
| 8 | CUNEO | 18.86 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 9 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 18.19 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 10 | NONAME | 16.29 | 3.00 | 7 |
| 11 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 15.97 | 1.00 | 7 |
| 12 | BRUNET | 15.14 | 1.00 | 7 |
| 13 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 14.00 | 3.00 | 7 |
| 14 | MARILL | 12.86 | 1.00 | 7 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 11.00 | 2.00 | 7 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 7 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R7 | BAM% |
|---|
BRENO vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34262) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | HARRIS | |
| 25 | 4♥ | W | ♠10 | +2 | 680 | 73% | 6♣ | W | ♠4 | = | 1370 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♠ | S | ♣Q | = | 620 | 53% | 4♠ | N | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 4♥ | W | +2 | 680 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 67% | ||||
| 26 | 4♠ | S | = | 620 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs BRUNET 3 : 1 VP (match 34263) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BRUNET | |
| 25 | 4♥ | E | ♠10 | +3 | 710 | 50% | 6♣ | E | ♣4 | = | 1370 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 90% | 4♠ | N | ♣4 | +1 | 650 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 4♥ | E | +3 | 710 | 50% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 67% | ||||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs FRANCE SENIORS 2 : 2 VP (match 34264) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 25 | 5♦x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 87% | 6♥ | E | ♠10 | = | 1430 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 53% | 4♠ | N | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 5♦x | N | -2 | 300 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 80% | ||||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs NONAME 1 : 3 VP (match 34265) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | NONAME | |
| 25 | 6♥ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 1460 | 93% | 4♥ | E | ♦2 | +3 | 710 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 53% | 4♠ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♥ | E | +1 | 1460 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +3 | 710 | 50% | ||||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs CUNEO 0 : 4 VP (match 34266) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | CUNEO | |
| 25 | 6♥ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 1460 | 93% | 3NT | E | ♠J | +3 | 690 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 100% | 4♠ | N | ♣Q | = | 620 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.9 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♥ | E | +1 | 1460 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +3 | 690 | 63% | ||||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs LUPO VELOCE 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34267) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 25 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 26 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| 26 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs NEMESIS 1 : 3 VP (match 34268) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | NEMESIS | |
| 25 | 6♥ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 1460 | 93% | 6♣ | W | ♦2 | = | 1370 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 53% | 4♠ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♥ | E | +1 | 1460 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 67% | ||||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 3 : 1 VP (match 34269) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 25 | 3NT | E | ♠10 | +2 | 660 | 80% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | +3 | 690 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 53% | 4♠ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 63% | ||||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|