Round 25 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 25 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PACIFIC | LUPO VELOCE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BRENO | POLAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | FRANCE SENIORS | MARILL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | NEMESIS | BELL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CUNEO | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | BYE | BRUNET | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 8 | HARRIS | NONAME | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 25↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 25 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R25 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | 66.51 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | 61.23 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 3 | POLAND | 60.23 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 4 | NONAME | 58.09 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 5 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 57.59 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 6 | FRANCE SENIORS | 57.11 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 7 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 55.37 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 8 | BRENO | 55.17 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 9 | PACIFIC | 53.74 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 10 | NEMESIS | 53.50 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 11 | MARILL | 53.06 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 12 | CUNEO | 52.26 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 48.94 | 2.40 | 25 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 47.40 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 39.40 | 0.00 | 25 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 25 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R25 | BAM% |
|---|
PACIFIC vs LUPO VELOCE 4 : 0 VP (match 34703) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 3 | 3NT | S | ♥4 | +2 | 460 | 70% | 3NT | S | ♠Q | +1 | 430 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 3♦x | W | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 60% | 2NT | N | ♠Q | +2 | 180 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 57% | ||||
| 4 | 3♦x | W | -1 | 200 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | +2 | 180 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs POLAND 2 : 2 VP (match 34704) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | POLAND | |
| 3 | 3NT | S | ♠Q | +2 | 460 | 70% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 420 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 2NT | N | ♠Q | +2 | 180 | 73% | 2♠x | W | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 73% | ||||
| 4 | 2NT | N | +2 | 180 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♠x | W | -1 | 200 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs MARILL 2 : 2 VP (match 34705) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | MARILL | |
| 3 | 3NTx | S | ♠Q | +2 | 750 | 93% | 5♣ | N | ♠A | = | 400 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 2NT | N | ♠Q | +2 | 180 | 73% | 2♠x | W | ♥A | -4 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NTx | S | +2 | 750 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | N | = | 400 | 80% | ||||
| 4 | 2NT | N | +2 | 180 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♠x | W | -4 | 1100 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs BELL 0 : 4 VP (match 34706) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | BELL | |
| 3 | 3NT | S | ♥6 | +1 | 430 | 57% | 3NT | S | ♥4 | +2 | 460 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 2NT | N | ♠Q | +2 | 180 | 73% | 2♥ | E | ♣4 | -4 | 400 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 70% | ||||
| 4 | 2NT | N | +2 | 180 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -4 | 400 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 1 : 3 VP (match 34707) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 3 | 3NT | S | ♥2 | +1 | 430 | 57% | 3NTxx | N | ♥3 | +4 | 1600 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 2♦x | W | ♦K | -1 | 200 | 60% | 2♠x | E | ♥6 | -1 | 200 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 3NTxx | N | +4 | 1600 | 100% | ||||
| 4 | 2♦x | W | -1 | 200 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠x | E | -1 | 200 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 0 : 4 VP (match 34708) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 3 | 3NT | S | ♥4 | +2 | 460 | 70% | 3NTx | S | ♠Q | +1 | 650 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 2NT | N | ♠Q | +2 | 180 | 73% | 2♥x | E | ♣4 | -2 | 500 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 3NTx | S | +1 | 650 | 87% | ||||
| 4 | 2NT | N | +2 | 180 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♥x | E | -2 | 500 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs BRUNET 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34709) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | BRUNET | |
| 3 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS-1.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| 4 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs NONAME 0 : 4 VP (match 34710) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | NONAME | |
| 3 | 3NT | S | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 3NT | N | ♦2 | +1 | 430 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 2♥ | E | ♠J | -2 | 200 | 60% | 2♠x | E | ♦2 | -3 | 800 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 57% | ||||
| 4 | 2♥ | E | -2 | 200 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 2♠x | E | -3 | 800 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|