Round 9 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 9 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND | HARRIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | MARILL | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BRENO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BYE | BRUNET | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 5 | BELL | FRANCE SENIORS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | PACIFIC | NONAME | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | CUNEO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | NEMESIS | LUPO VELOCE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 9↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 9 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R9 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 33.83 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 2 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 26.19 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 3 | POLAND | 25.83 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 4 | FRANCE SENIORS | 25.11 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 5 | BELL | 23.11 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 6 | BRENO | 22.97 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 7 | CUNEO | 22.86 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 8 | NEMESIS | 22.50 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 9 | PACIFIC | 22.14 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 10 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 20.97 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 11 | NONAME | 19.69 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 12 | BRUNET | 18.54 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 13 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 18.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 14 | MARILL | 17.86 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 14.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 9 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R9 | BAM% |
|---|
POLAND vs HARRIS 3 : 1 VP (match 34278) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | HARRIS | |
| 29 | 2♥ | E | ♦3 | = | 110 | 73% | 3♣ | W | ♦K | = | 110 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 2NT | N | ♠2 | +2 | 180 | 60% | 1NTx | E | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 73% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | N | +2 | 180 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 1NTx | E | -1 | 100 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 34279) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 29 | 3♣ | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 83% | 3NT | E | ♣3 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3NT | N | ♠2 | = | 400 | 83% | 1NT | S | ♠4 | +3 | 180 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| 30 | 3NT | N | = | 400 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | +3 | 180 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs BRENO 4 : 0 VP (match 34280) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BRENO | |
| 29 | 3♣ | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 83% | 3♦ | E | ♠2 | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2NT | S | ♠Q | +2 | 180 | 60% | 2NT | N | ♠7 | +1 | 150 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 73% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | S | +2 | 180 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | +1 | 150 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs BRUNET 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34281) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | BRUNET | |
| 29 | Pass | — | 0 | 63% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 30 | Pass | — | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | Pass | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| 30 | Pass | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs FRANCE SENIORS 0 : 4 VP (match 34282) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 29 | 3♦ | E | ♦8 | +1 | 130 | 93% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 1NT | S | ♠4 | +2 | 150 | 63% | 3NT | N | ♠3 | = | 400 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 93% | 2 | ||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| 30 | 1NT | S | +2 | 150 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs NONAME 3 : 1 VP (match 34283) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | NONAME | |
| 29 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 3♣ | E | ♦2 | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3NT | N | ♦5 | +1 | 430 | 97% | 3NT | N | ♦2 | +1 | 430 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 73% | ||||
| 30 | 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs CUNEO 2 : 2 VP (match 34284) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | CUNEO | |
| 29 | 2♦ | E | ♦2 | +3 | 150 | 100% | 2NT | E | ♠Q | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 1NT | S | ♠Q | +3 | 180 | 60% | 3NT | N | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 2♦ | E | +3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | -3 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| 30 | 1NT | S | +3 | 180 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs LUPO VELOCE 0 : 4 VP (match 34285) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 29 | 3♣ | W | ♦K | = | 110 | 73% | 2♣ | W | ♦K | = | 90 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2NT | N | ♠3 | = | 120 | 73% | 1NT | S | ♠4 | +3 | 180 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♣ | W | = | 90 | 53% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | N | = | 120 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | +3 | 180 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|