Round 11 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 11 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BYE | MARILL | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 3 | BELL | POLAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | PACIFIC | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | BRENO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | NEMESIS | BRUNET | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | LUPO VELOCE | FRANCE SENIORS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CUNEO | NONAME | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 11↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 11 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R11 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 38.83 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 2 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 31.19 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 3 | POLAND | 28.83 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 4 | NEMESIS | 28.50 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 5 | PACIFIC | 28.14 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 6 | FRANCE SENIORS | 28.11 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 7 | BELL | 27.11 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 8 | BRENO | 26.97 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 9 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 25.97 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 10 | CUNEO | 25.86 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 11 | NONAME | 23.69 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 12 | MARILL | 22.26 | 2.40 | 11 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 20.54 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 20.40 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 18.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 11 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R11 | BAM% |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34294) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | HARRIS | |
| 1 | 3NTx | E | ♠10 | +1 | 650 | 90% | 5NT | E | ♠8 | +1 | 490 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3NT | E | ♣2 | = | 400 | 63% | 3NT | E | ♣6 | +1 | 430 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3NTx | E | +1 | 650 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 5NT | E | +1 | 490 | 70% | ||||
| 2 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs MARILL 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34295) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | MARILL | |
| 1 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| 2 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs POLAND 2 : 2 VP (match 34296) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | POLAND | |
| 1 | 4NT | E | ♠10 | +1 | 460 | 60% | 6♦ | E | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3NT | E | ♣7 | = | 400 | 63% | 3NT | E | ♣8 | +1 | 430 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4NT | E | +1 | 460 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 6♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| 2 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 4 : 0 VP (match 34297) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 1 | 6♦x | E | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 100% | 5♣ | E | ♥6 | = | 400 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3NT | E | ♣6 | +1 | 430 | 67% | 3NTxx | E | ♥J | +1 | 1000 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 6♦x | E | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | = | 400 | 53% | ||||
| 2 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3NTxx | E | +1 | 1000 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs BRENO 2 : 2 VP (match 34298) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | BRENO | |
| 1 | 3NT | E | ♠10 | +3 | 490 | 70% | 6♣x | W | ♠5 | = | 1090 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3NT | E | ♣6 | +1 | 430 | 67% | 4♣ | E | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3NT | E | +3 | 490 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6♣x | W | = | 1090 | 100% | ||||
| 2 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs BRUNET 4 : 0 VP (match 34299) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | BRUNET | |
| 1 | 5♦ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 5♣x | W | ♣4 | +1 | 650 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 2NT | E | ♦9 | = | 120 | 80% | 2NT | E | ♣6 | +1 | 150 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 5♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | +1 | 650 | 90% | ||||
| 2 | 2NT | E | = | 120 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | +1 | 150 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs FRANCE SENIORS 2 : 2 VP (match 34300) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 1 | 5♠x | S | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 80% | 5♣ | W | ♠5 | +1 | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3NT | E | ♣6 | +1 | 430 | 67% | 2♥x | N | ♥Q | -2 | 500 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 5♠x | S | -3 | 500 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 420 | 53% | ||||
| 2 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 2♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs NONAME 2 : 2 VP (match 34301) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | NONAME | |
| 1 | 6NTx | W | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 87% | 5♦x | E | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 3NT | E | ♣2 | +1 | 430 | 67% | 3NT | E | ♣5 | +1 | 430 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 6NTx | W | -1 | 100 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| 2 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|