Round 30 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 30 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | LUPO VELOCE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BYE | CUNEO | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 3 | HARRIS | NEMESIS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | NONAME | FRANCE SENIORS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BRUNET | BRENO | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | PACIFIC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | POLAND | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BELL | MARILL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 30↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 30 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R30 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | 77.51 | 3.00 | 30 |
| 2 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 73.59 | 4.00 | 30 |
| 3 | LUPO VELOCE | 70.23 | 0.00 | 30 |
| 3 | POLAND | 70.23 | 0.00 | 30 |
| 5 | NEMESIS | 68.50 | 3.00 | 30 |
| 6 | NONAME | 68.09 | 3.00 | 30 |
| 7 | FRANCE SENIORS | 67.31 | 1.00 | 30 |
| 8 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 66.37 | 2.00 | 30 |
| 9 | PACIFIC | 63.34 | 2.00 | 30 |
| 10 | CUNEO | 62.66 | 2.40 | 30 |
| 11 | MARILL | 62.46 | 1.00 | 30 |
| 12 | BRENO | 62.17 | 4.00 | 30 |
| 13 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 58.80 | 4.00 | 30 |
| 14 | BRUNET | 53.94 | 0.00 | 30 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 46.40 | 1.00 | 30 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 30 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R30 | BAM% |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs LUPO VELOCE 4 : 0 VP (match 34743) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 13 | 4♥ | E | ♠8 | +2 | 680 | 63% | 6♥ | E | ♣A | = | 1430 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 3♠ | N | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 80% | 5♦ | S | ♠Q | -2 | 100 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♥ | E | +2 | 680 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 83% | ||||
| 14 | 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs CUNEO 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34744) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | CUNEO | |
| 13 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 70% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| 14 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs NEMESIS 1 : 3 VP (match 34745) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | NEMESIS | |
| 13 | 4♥ | W | ♥10 | +2 | 680 | 63% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +2 | 680 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 4♠ | N | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 93% | 3NT | N | ♣6 | +1 | 430 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♥ | W | +2 | 680 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +2 | 680 | 63% | ||||
| 14 | 4♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs FRANCE SENIORS 3 : 1 VP (match 34746) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 13 | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +2 | 680 | 63% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +2 | 680 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 4NT | S | ♠Q | = | 430 | 67% | 3♥ | E | ♦A | -5 | 250 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♥ | W | +2 | 680 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +2 | 680 | 63% | ||||
| 14 | 4NT | S | = | 430 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | E | -5 | 250 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs BRENO 0 : 4 VP (match 34747) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | BRENO | |
| 13 | 6♥ | W | ♣K | = | 1430 | 83% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +2 | 680 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 3NT | S | ♠Q | +1 | 430 | 67% | 3♥x | E | ♦A | -3 | 500 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 6♥ | W | = | 1430 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +2 | 680 | 63% | ||||
| 14 | 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3♥x | E | -3 | 500 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs PACIFIC 2 : 2 VP (match 34748) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | PACIFIC | |
| 13 | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +2 | 680 | 63% | 6♥ | E | ♣9 | = | 1430 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 3NT | N | ♣6 | +1 | 430 | 67% | 5♣x | E | ♣6 | -3 | 500 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♥ | W | +2 | 680 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 83% | ||||
| 14 | 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | E | -3 | 500 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs POLAND 4 : 0 VP (match 34749) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | POLAND | |
| 13 | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +2 | 680 | 63% | 6♥ | E | ♣K | = | 1430 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 3NT | N | ♥3 | +1 | 430 | 67% | 3♣x | W | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♥ | W | +2 | 680 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 83% | ||||
| 14 | 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3♣x | W | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs MARILL 3 : 1 VP (match 34750) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | MARILL | |
| 13 | 6♥ | W | ♣K | = | 1430 | 83% | 6♥ | W | ♣K | = | 1430 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 3♣x | W | ♣Q | -3 | 500 | 93% | 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 6♥ | W | = | 1430 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♥ | W | = | 1430 | 83% | ||||
| 14 | 3♣x | W | -3 | 500 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|