Round 23 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 23 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MARILL | LUPO VELOCE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | POLAND | BELL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | PACIFIC | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BRENO | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | FRANCE SENIORS | BRUNET | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | NEMESIS | NONAME | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | CUNEO | HARRIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 23↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 23 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R23 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | 61.51 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | 58.23 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 3 | POLAND | 57.23 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 4 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 56.59 | 2.40 | 23 |
| 5 | FRANCE SENIORS | 54.11 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 6 | NONAME | 51.09 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 7 | NEMESIS | 50.50 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 8 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 50.37 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 9 | BRENO | 50.17 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 10 | CUNEO | 49.26 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 11 | MARILL | 49.06 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 12 | PACIFIC | 47.74 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 44.54 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 41.40 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 37.40 | 0.00 | 23 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 23 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R23 | BAM% |
|---|
MARILL vs LUPO VELOCE 2 : 2 VP (match 34687) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 29 | 7♣x | N | ♥K | -5 | 1400 | 77% | 6♦ | E | ♣A | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3NTxx | S | ♠K | = | 800 | 97% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 7♣x | N | -5 | 1400 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 1390 | 60% | ||||
| 30 | 3NTxx | S | = | 800 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs BELL 2 : 2 VP (match 34688) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | BELL | |
| 29 | 7NTx | E | ♥5 | = | 2490 | 100% | 7♣x | N | ♥K | -5 | 1400 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 80% | 5♦x | S | ♠K | -3 | 500 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 7NTx | E | = | 2490 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 7♣x | N | -5 | 1400 | 77% | ||||
| 30 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | S | -3 | 500 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 4 : 0 VP (match 34689) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 29 | 6♦ | E | ♣A | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 7♣x | N | ♦6 | -5 | 1400 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 5♥x | E | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 73% | 5♦x | S | ♠K | -3 | 500 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 6♦ | E | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 7♣x | N | -5 | 1400 | 77% | ||||
| 30 | 5♥x | E | -2 | 300 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | S | -3 | 500 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 34690) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 29 | 7♦ | E | ♥2 | = | 2140 | 93% | 5♣x | N | ♥K | -3 | 800 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♠x | W | ♥2 | -4 | 800 | 97% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 7♦ | E | = | 2140 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | N | -3 | 800 | 87% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠x | W | -4 | 800 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs BRUNET 3 : 1 VP (match 34691) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | BRUNET | |
| 29 | 6♦ | W | ♣K | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 6♦ | E | — | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 3NTx | S | ♠A | = | 550 | 87% | 5♦xx | S | ♣A | -3 | 1000 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 6♦ | W | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 1390 | 60% | ||||
| 30 | 3NTx | S | = | 550 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 5♦xx | S | -3 | 1000 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs NONAME 3 : 1 VP (match 34692) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | NONAME | |
| 29 | 6♦ | E | ♣A | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 6♦ | E | ♦2 | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 3♦x | S | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 4♦x | N | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 6♦ | E | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 1390 | 60% | ||||
| 30 | 3♦x | S | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♦x | N | -2 | 300 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs HARRIS 4 : 0 VP (match 34693) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | HARRIS | |
| 29 | 6♦ | E | ♣A | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 7♣x | N | ♥A | -5 | 1400 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 6♥x | E | ♦A | -3 | 500 | 80% | 4♥ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 6♦ | E | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 7♣x | N | -5 | 1400 | 77% | ||||
| 30 | 6♥x | E | -3 | 500 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 34694) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BYE | |
| 29 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 50% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 50% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| 30 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 50% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|