Round 10 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 10 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MARILL | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | POLAND | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | BYE | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 4 | BELL | BRENO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PACIFIC | BRUNET | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | FRANCE SENIORS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | NEMESIS | NONAME | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | LUPO VELOCE | CUNEO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 10↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 10 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R10 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 36.83 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 2 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 29.19 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 3 | POLAND | 26.83 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 4 | FRANCE SENIORS | 26.11 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 5 | BELL | 25.11 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 6 | BRENO | 24.97 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 7 | NEMESIS | 24.50 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 8 | PACIFIC | 24.14 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 9 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 23.97 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 10 | CUNEO | 23.86 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 11 | NONAME | 21.69 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 12 | BRUNET | 20.54 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 13 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 20.40 | 2.40 | 10 |
| 14 | MARILL | 19.86 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 16.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 10 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R10 | BAM% |
|---|
MARILL vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34286) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | HARRIS | |
| 31 | 2♥ | W | ♠J | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2♥ | W | ♥4 | +2 | 170 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 1NT | W | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 97% | 1NT | W | — | +1 | 120 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-1.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | +2 | 170 | 100% | ||||
| 32 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs POLAND 3 : 1 VP (match 34287) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | POLAND | |
| 31 | 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 53% | 2♥ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 1NT | W | ♠5 | = | 90 | 57% | 2♥ | E | ♣A | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 32 | 1NT | W | = | 90 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34288) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 31 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | ||||
| 32 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs BRENO 2 : 2 VP (match 34289) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | BRENO | |
| 31 | 4♥ | E | ♦9 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3NT | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 73% | 3NT | W | ♠5 | -2 | 200 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs BRUNET 2 : 2 VP (match 34290) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | BRUNET | |
| 31 | 2♥ | W | ♠J | +1 | 140 | 93% | 3♣ | W | ♣4 | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 1NT | W | ♠4 | = | 90 | 57% | 1NT | W | — | +2 | 150 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 32 | 1NT | W | = | 90 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs FRANCE SENIORS 3 : 1 VP (match 34291) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 31 | 3♣ | E | ♣4 | = | 110 | 53% | 3♣ | E | ♦5 | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 3NT | W | ♥10 | -2 | 200 | 90% | 2NT | E | ♣Q | = | 120 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs NONAME 2 : 2 VP (match 34292) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | NONAME | |
| 31 | 3♣ | E | ♠A | = | 110 | 53% | 3♣ | E | ♦6 | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 3NT | W | ♠4 | -2 | 200 | 90% | 3NT | W | ♠4 | -2 | 200 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs CUNEO 3 : 1 VP (match 34293) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | CUNEO | |
| 31 | 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 53% | 3♣ | E | ♣J | +1 | 130 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 1NT | W | — | = | 90 | 57% | 1NT | E | ♠5 | = | 90 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | +1 | 130 | 87% | ||||
| 32 | 1NT | W | = | 90 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|