Round 16 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 16 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BYE | LUPO VELOCE | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 2 | HARRIS | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | NONAME | CUNEO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BRUNET | NEMESIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | FRANCE SENIORS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BRENO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | BELL | PACIFIC | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | MARILL | POLAND | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 16↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 16 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R16 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 47.23 | 2.40 | 16 |
| 2 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 44.19 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 3 | POLAND | 40.83 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 4 | NEMESIS | 39.90 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 5 | BELL | 39.11 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 6 | NONAME | 38.69 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 7 | BRENO | 37.97 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 8 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 36.97 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 9 | FRANCE SENIORS | 36.11 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 10 | CUNEO | 34.26 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 11 | PACIFIC | 32.54 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 12 | MARILL | 31.26 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 30.54 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 30.40 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 26.40 | 0.00 | 16 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 16 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R16 | BAM% |
|---|
BYE vs LUPO VELOCE 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34631) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 15 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 77% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| 16 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 0 : 4 VP (match 34632) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 15 | 3♥x | N | ♣4 | -1 | 200 | 87% | 3NT | W | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 93% | 6♣ | W | ♠K | -3 | 300 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 67% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | W | -3 | 300 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs CUNEO 4 : 0 VP (match 34633) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | CUNEO | |
| 15 | 3NT | E | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2NT | W | ♥K | = | 120 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | ♦5 | +3 | 510 | 83% | 4♠ | N | ♣A | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | = | 120 | 73% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs NEMESIS 3 : 1 VP (match 34634) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | NEMESIS | |
| 15 | 2NT | W | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2♥x | N | ♣6 | -1 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | ♥8 | +3 | 510 | 83% | 4♥ | N | ♥7 | +3 | 510 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2NT | W | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 2♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | +3 | 510 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs FRANCE SENIORS 2 : 2 VP (match 34635) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 15 | 3NT | W | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | ♣A | = | 420 | 53% | 4♠ | N | ♣A | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 67% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs BRENO 2 : 2 VP (match 34636) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BRENO | |
| 15 | 3♦ | W | ♥K | -3 | 150 | 100% | 3NT | W | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 5♣x | W | ♠A | -2 | 500 | 60% | 4♠ | N | ♥7 | +3 | 510 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦ | W | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 67% | ||||
| 16 | 5♣x | W | -2 | 500 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs PACIFIC 4 : 0 VP (match 34637) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | PACIFIC | |
| 15 | 3♦ | W | ♥K | -2 | 100 | 93% | 2♥x | N | ♦6 | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | ♥7 | +3 | 510 | 83% | 4♠ | N | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-1.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦ | W | -2 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 2♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs POLAND 0 : 4 VP (match 34638) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | POLAND | |
| 15 | 2♥x | N | ♠4 | -1 | 200 | 87% | 3NT | W | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 93% | 4♠ | N | ♥7 | +3 | 510 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 67% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|