Round 20 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 20 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | LUPO VELOCE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BRUNET | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | BELL | NONAME | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | MARILL | HARRIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | POLAND | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | PACIFIC | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | BRENO | CUNEO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | FRANCE SENIORS | NEMESIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 20↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 20 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R20 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 53.23 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 2 | BELL | 52.51 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 3 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 51.19 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 4 | POLAND | 49.23 | 2.40 | 20 |
| 5 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 46.37 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 6 | FRANCE SENIORS | 46.11 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 7 | BRENO | 45.77 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 8 | NONAME | 45.09 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 9 | NEMESIS | 43.10 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 10 | MARILL | 43.06 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 11 | PACIFIC | 40.74 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 12 | CUNEO | 39.26 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 38.54 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 38.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 35.40 | 0.00 | 20 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 20 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R20 | BAM% |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs LUPO VELOCE 2 : 2 VP (match 34663) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 23 | 3♦ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2♦ | W | ♣4 | = | 90 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 24 | 3NT | E | ♣3 | +1 | 430 | 77% | 3NT | E | ♦2 | = | 400 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 3♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | W | = | 90 | 87% | ||||
| 24 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs BRUNET 3 : 1 VP (match 34664) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BRUNET | |
| 23 | 2♦ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2♦ | W | ♣4 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 24 | 4♥ | W | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 80% | 3NT | E | ♣4 | = | 400 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| 24 | 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs NONAME 3 : 1 VP (match 34665) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | NONAME | |
| 23 | 2NT | W | ♦6 | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2♦ | W | ♦5 | = | 90 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 24 | 3NT | E | ♦2 | +1 | 430 | 77% | 3NT | E | ♠6 | +1 | 430 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-1.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2NT | W | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | W | = | 90 | 87% | ||||
| 24 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs HARRIS 4 : 0 VP (match 34666) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | HARRIS | |
| 23 | 2♦ | W | ♦3 | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2♦ | W | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 24 | 4♥ | W | ♦4 | -2 | 100 | 93% | 4♥ | W | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| 24 | 4♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 34667) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | BYE | |
| 23 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 70% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 24 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 70% | ||||
| 24 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 2 : 2 VP (match 34668) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 23 | 2NT | N | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2♦ | W | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 24 | 3♦x | N | ♥6 | -2 | 300 | 53% | 3NT | E | ♦2 | +1 | 430 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2NT | N | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| 24 | 3♦x | N | -2 | 300 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs CUNEO 3 : 1 VP (match 34669) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | CUNEO | |
| 23 | 2♦ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2♦ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 24 | 3NT | E | ♥2 | +2 | 460 | 93% | 3♦x | N | ♥6 | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| 24 | 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | N | -3 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs NEMESIS 4 : 0 VP (match 34670) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | NEMESIS | |
| 23 | 2♦ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2♦ | W | ♦5 | = | 90 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 24 | 4♥ | W | ♣7 | -3 | 150 | 100% | 4♥ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | W | = | 90 | 87% | ||||
| 24 | 4♥ | W | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|