Round 24 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 24 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND | LUPO VELOCE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | PACIFIC | MARILL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | BRENO | BELL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | FRANCE SENIORS | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | NEMESIS | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CUNEO | BRUNET | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | NONAME | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BYE | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 24↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 24 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R24 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | 62.51 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | 61.23 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 3 | POLAND | 58.23 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 4 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 57.59 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 5 | FRANCE SENIORS | 55.11 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 6 | NONAME | 54.09 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 7 | NEMESIS | 53.50 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 8 | BRENO | 53.17 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 9 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 51.37 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 10 | CUNEO | 51.26 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 11 | MARILL | 51.06 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 12 | PACIFIC | 49.74 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 46.54 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 44.40 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 39.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 24 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R24 | BAM% |
|---|
POLAND vs LUPO VELOCE 1 : 3 VP (match 34695) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 1 | 3NT | E | ♠9 | +1 | 430 | 57% | 6♥ | W | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♥5 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♣9 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs MARILL 2 : 2 VP (match 34696) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | MARILL | |
| 1 | 6♥ | E | ♠10 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♥ | W | ♠3 | = | 420 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 3♥x | N | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 6♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 57% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs BELL 3 : 1 VP (match 34697) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | BELL | |
| 1 | 6♥ | E | ♣J | -3 | 150 | 100% | 4♥ | E | ♠2 | = | 420 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♥ | E | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♥K | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 6♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 57% | ||||
| 2 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 1 : 3 VP (match 34698) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 1 | 4♥x | E | ♠10 | +1 | 690 | 100% | 4NT | E | ♥6 | +1 | 460 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♥K | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4♥x | E | +1 | 690 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | E | +1 | 460 | 87% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 3 : 1 VP (match 34699) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 1 | 4♥ | E | ♠9 | +1 | 450 | 70% | 4NT | E | ♠9 | +1 | 460 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | E | +1 | 460 | 87% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs BRUNET 2 : 2 VP (match 34700) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | BRUNET | |
| 1 | 6♥ | W | ♦4 | -2 | 100 | 93% | 3NT | E | ♣4 | +1 | 430 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♥5 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♣4 | = | 420 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 6♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 57% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs NONAME 1 : 3 VP (match 34701) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | NONAME | |
| 1 | 3NT | W | ♠3 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 4♥ | E | ♦2 | +1 | 450 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 70% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34702) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | HARRIS | |
| 1 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 70% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 70% | ||||
| 2 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|