Round 26 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 26 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRENO | LUPO VELOCE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | FRANCE SENIORS | PACIFIC | 2 | 2 | 1.80 | 2.20 | protocol → |
| 3 | NEMESIS | POLAND | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CUNEO | MARILL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BELL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BYE | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 7 | HARRIS | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | NONAME | BRUNET | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 26↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 26 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R26 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | 66.51 | 0.00 | 26 |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | 65.23 | 4.00 | 26 |
| 3 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 61.59 | 4.00 | 26 |
| 4 | NONAME | 61.09 | 3.00 | 26 |
| 5 | POLAND | 60.23 | 0.00 | 26 |
| 6 | FRANCE SENIORS | 58.91 | 1.80 | 26 |
| 7 | NEMESIS | 57.50 | 4.00 | 26 |
| 8 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 57.37 | 2.00 | 26 |
| 9 | PACIFIC | 55.94 | 2.20 | 26 |
| 10 | CUNEO | 55.26 | 3.00 | 26 |
| 11 | BRENO | 55.17 | 0.00 | 26 |
| 12 | MARILL | 54.06 | 1.00 | 26 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 49.94 | 1.00 | 26 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 49.80 | 2.40 | 26 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 41.40 | 2.00 | 26 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 26 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R26 | BAM% |
|---|
BRENO vs LUPO VELOCE 0 : 4 VP (match 34711) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 5 | 3NT | W | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 100% | 2♠ | E | ♦8 | +2 | 170 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 6♥x | N | ♠A | -6 | 1400 | 100% | 5♥ | N | ♠A | -4 | 200 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-2.0 | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 67% | ||||
| 6 | 6♥x | N | -6 | 1400 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 5♥ | N | -4 | 200 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-2.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs PACIFIC 1.8 : 2.2 VP (match 34712) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | PACIFIC | |
| 5 | 2♠ | E | ♦8 | +2 | 170 | 67% | 2♠ | E | ♦6 | +2 | 170 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 67% | ||||
| 6 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs POLAND 4 : 0 VP (match 34713) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | POLAND | |
| 5 | 2♠ | E | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2♠ | E | ♦7 | +2 | 170 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 5♣ | N | ♣6 | +1 | 420 | 93% | 5♣ | S | ♥A | = | 400 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 67% | ||||
| 6 | 5♣ | N | +1 | 420 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | S | = | 400 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs MARILL 3 : 1 VP (match 34714) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | MARILL | |
| 5 | 2♠ | E | ♦7 | +2 | 170 | 67% | 2♠ | E | ♦8 | +2 | 170 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 6♣ | N | ♠10 | -2 | 100 | 67% | 6♣x | S | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 67% | ||||
| 6 | 6♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 6♣x | S | -2 | 300 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs BELL 4 : 0 VP (match 34715) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BELL | |
| 5 | 2♠ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 140 | 77% | 2♠ | E | ♦8 | +2 | 170 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 5♠x | E | ♥J | -1 | 200 | 80% | 4♠ | E | ♠2 | = | 620 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 67% | ||||
| 6 | 5♠x | E | -1 | 200 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34716) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 5 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| 6 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 34717) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 5 | 2♠ | E | ♦7 | +1 | 140 | 77% | 2NT | W | ♥8 | +1 | 150 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | ♠2 | = | 620 | 90% | 6♣ | S | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 67% | ||||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | S | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs BRUNET 3 : 1 VP (match 34718) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | BRUNET | |
| 5 | 2♠ | E | ♥2 | +2 | 170 | 67% | 2♠ | E | ♣4 | +2 | 170 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 6♠x | E | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 100% | 5♥ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 67% | ||||
| 6 | 6♠x | E | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 5♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|