Round 27 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 27 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRANCE SENIORS | LUPO VELOCE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | NEMESIS | BRENO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CUNEO | PACIFIC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | POLAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BYE | MARILL | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 6 | HARRIS | BELL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | NONAME | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BRUNET | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 27↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 27 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R27 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | 68.51 | 2.00 | 27 |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | 66.23 | 1.00 | 27 |
| 3 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 63.59 | 2.00 | 27 |
| 4 | POLAND | 62.23 | 2.00 | 27 |
| 5 | NONAME | 62.09 | 1.00 | 27 |
| 6 | FRANCE SENIORS | 61.91 | 3.00 | 27 |
| 7 | NEMESIS | 61.50 | 4.00 | 27 |
| 8 | PACIFIC | 57.94 | 2.00 | 27 |
| 9 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 57.37 | 0.00 | 27 |
| 10 | CUNEO | 57.26 | 2.00 | 27 |
| 11 | MARILL | 56.46 | 2.40 | 27 |
| 12 | BRENO | 55.17 | 0.00 | 27 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 53.94 | 4.00 | 27 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 52.80 | 3.00 | 27 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 43.40 | 2.00 | 27 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 27 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R27 | BAM% |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs LUPO VELOCE 3 : 1 VP (match 34719) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♦10 | -4 | 400 | 87% | 4♠ | E | ♦10 | -3 | 300 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | ♥2 | +1 | 140 | 53% | 3♠ | N | ♣A | = | 140 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | -4 | 400 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 80% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs BRENO 4 : 0 VP (match 34720) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | BRENO | |
| 7 | 3♥ | N | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 5♥x | N | ♣A | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♠ | N | ♠6 | = | 420 | 100% | 4♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-2.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | N | -3 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| 8 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs PACIFIC 2 : 2 VP (match 34721) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | PACIFIC | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 73% | 4♥ | N | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♠ | N | ♣A | = | 140 | 53% | 2♠ | N | ♦3 | +2 | 170 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs POLAND 2 : 2 VP (match 34722) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | POLAND | |
| 7 | 4♥x | N | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 93% | 3♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | ♦8 | +2 | 170 | 77% | 2NT | E | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | -2 | 100 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs MARILL 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34723) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | MARILL | |
| 7 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | ||||
| 8 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs BELL 2 : 2 VP (match 34724) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | BELL | |
| 7 | 3♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♥ | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♠ | N | ♥6 | +1 | 170 | 77% | 2♠ | S | ♠3 | +2 | 170 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 1 : 3 VP (match 34725) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 7 | 4♠x | E | ♦A | -2 | 500 | 97% | 4♠x | E | ♥Q | -2 | 500 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 1NT | W | ♠5 | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2♠ | N | ♥6 | +2 | 170 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠x | E | -2 | 500 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠x | E | -2 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| 8 | 1NT | W | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 4 : 0 VP (match 34726) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 7 | 3♥ | N | ♣A | = | 140 | 67% | 4♥x | N | ♣A | -1 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 170 | 77% | 3♣ | E | ♥8 | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | -2 | 100 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|