Round 3 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 3 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CUNEO | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | NONAME | LUPO VELOCE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | FRANCE SENIORS | NEMESIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BRUNET | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BRENO | PACIFIC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BELL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | MARILL | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 3↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 3 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R3 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 16.43 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 2 | NEMESIS | 15.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 3 | POLAND | 12.83 | 2.40 | 3 |
| 4 | BELL | 12.71 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 5 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 12.29 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 6 | FRANCE SENIORS | 12.11 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 7 | BRENO | 10.97 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 8 | PACIFIC | 10.14 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 9 | CUNEO | 9.86 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 10 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 8.57 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 11 | BRUNET | 8.14 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 12 | NONAME | 7.29 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 13 | MARILL | 6.86 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 5.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 3 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R3 | BAM% |
|---|
CUNEO vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34230) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | HARRIS | |
| 17 | 3♣ | W | ♦3 | +1 | 130 | 93% | 1NT | E | ♦6 | = | 90 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 3♠ | E | ♣4 | +2 | 200 | 87% | 4♠ | E | ♦5 | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 53% | ||||
| 18 | 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs LUPO VELOCE 1 : 3 VP (match 34231) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 17 | 4♠ | E | ♦5 | -2 | 100 | 93% | 2♥ | N | ♦3 | +1 | 140 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | ♦5 | = | 420 | 53% | 4♠ | E | ♦10 | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 100% | ||||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs NEMESIS 3 : 1 VP (match 34232) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | NEMESIS | |
| 17 | 2♠ | W | ♥A | = | 110 | 77% | 2♠ | W | ♥A | = | 110 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | ♦10 | = | 420 | 53% | 4♠ | E | ♣5 | +1 | 450 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 77% | ||||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 34233) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 17 | 3♦ | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 110 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 450 | 90% | 4♠ | E | ♣4 | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 77% | ||||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs PACIFIC 2 : 2 VP (match 34234) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | PACIFIC | |
| 17 | 2♠ | W | ♥A | = | 110 | 77% | 3♦ | N | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | ♦5 | = | 420 | 53% | 4♠ | E | ♠A | +1 | 450 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs BELL 1 : 3 VP (match 34235) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BELL | |
| 17 | 3♦ | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 60% | 3♦ | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | ♠A | +1 | 450 | 90% | 4♠ | E | ♣4 | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 34236) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | BYE | |
| 17 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 77% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+1.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 77% | ||||
| 18 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 1 : 3 VP (match 34237) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 17 | 3♠ | W | ♦7 | = | 140 | 100% | 3♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | = | 420 | 53% | 4♠ | E | ♣5 | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 87% | ||||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|