Round 4 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 4 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NONAME | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | FRANCE SENIORS | CUNEO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | BRUNET | LUPO VELOCE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BRENO | NEMESIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | POLAND | PACIFIC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | MARILL | BELL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 4↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 4 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R4 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 18.43 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 2 | NEMESIS | 15.00 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 3 | BRENO | 14.97 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 4 | POLAND | 14.83 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 5 | BELL | 14.71 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 6 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 14.69 | 2.40 | 4 |
| 7 | FRANCE SENIORS | 13.11 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 8 | CUNEO | 12.86 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 9 | PACIFIC | 12.14 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 10 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 10.57 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 11 | BRUNET | 10.14 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 12 | NONAME | 9.29 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 13 | MARILL | 8.86 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 7.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 5.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 4 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R4 | BAM% |
|---|
NONAME vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34238) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | HARRIS | |
| 19 | 1NTx | E | ♦5 | +1 | 380 | 93% | 2♥ | S | ♠A | = | 110 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♥ | W | ♠K | = | 620 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 1NTx | E | +1 | 380 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 60% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs CUNEO 1 : 3 VP (match 34239) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | CUNEO | |
| 19 | 2♥ | S | ♠A | = | 110 | 60% | 2♥ | S | ♠A | = | 110 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♥x | W | ♠K | = | 790 | 100% | 4♥ | E | ♠K | = | 620 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 60% | ||||
| 20 | 4♥x | W | = | 790 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs LUPO VELOCE 2 : 2 VP (match 34240) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 19 | 2♥ | S | ♠A | = | 110 | 60% | 2♥ | S | ♠A | = | 110 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♥ | E | ♠7 | = | 620 | 73% | 4♥ | W | ♦2 | = | 620 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 60% | ||||
| 20 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs NEMESIS 4 : 0 VP (match 34241) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | NEMESIS | |
| 19 | 2♥ | S | ♠A | = | 110 | 60% | 3♣ | E | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 3♠ | S | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠ | E | ♥A | = | 620 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 3♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 34242) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 19 | 2♥ | S | ♠A | = | 110 | 60% | 3♣x | E | ♥Q | = | 670 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 3♠x | N | ♦K | -1 | 200 | 53% | 2♥ | N | ♦10 | +2 | 170 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 3♣x | E | = | 670 | 100% | ||||
| 20 | 3♠x | N | -1 | 200 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs PACIFIC 2 : 2 VP (match 34243) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | PACIFIC | |
| 19 | 2♥ | N | ♣J | +2 | 170 | 87% | 3♣ | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠x | N | ♦A | -2 | 500 | 53% | 2♠x | N | ♣6 | = | 670 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠x | N | -2 | 500 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 2♠x | N | = | 670 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs BELL 2 : 2 VP (match 34244) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | BELL | |
| 19 | 3♣x | E | ♠J | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2♠ | E | ♥Q | -3 | 300 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♣x | E | ♥A | = | 710 | 93% | 3♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 3♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 93% | ||||
| 20 | 4♣x | E | = | 710 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 34245) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BYE | |
| 19 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | ||||
| 20 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|