Round 5 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 5 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRANCE SENIORS | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BRUNET | NONAME | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | BRENO | CUNEO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | LUPO VELOCE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | POLAND | NEMESIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MARILL | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | PACIFIC | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BYE | BELL | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
Standings after round 5↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 5 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R5 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 20.43 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 2 | BRENO | 18.97 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 3 | BELL | 17.11 | 2.40 | 5 |
| 4 | NEMESIS | 17.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 5 | POLAND | 16.83 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 6 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 15.69 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 7 | PACIFIC | 15.14 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 8 | FRANCE SENIORS | 15.11 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 9 | CUNEO | 12.86 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 10 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 12.57 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 11 | BRUNET | 12.14 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 12 | NONAME | 11.29 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 13 | MARILL | 10.86 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 9.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 7.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 5 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R5 | BAM% |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34246) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | HARRIS | |
| 21 | 1NT | E | ♠J | = | 90 | 67% | 1NT | E | ♣8 | +1 | 120 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 1NT | E | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 73% | ||||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs NONAME 2 : 2 VP (match 34247) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | NONAME | |
| 21 | 1NT | E | ♣8 | = | 90 | 67% | 2♦ | E | ♦2 | = | 90 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | ♠J | -1 | 100 | 87% | 4♥ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 1NT | E | = | 90 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 67% | ||||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs CUNEO 4 : 0 VP (match 34248) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | CUNEO | |
| 21 | 1NT | E | ♣Q | -2 | 100 | 100% | 1NT | E | ♣Q | +1 | 120 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | ♠J | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | E | ♣Q | +1 | 650 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 1NT | E | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 73% | ||||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs LUPO VELOCE 2 : 2 VP (match 34249) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 21 | 1NT | E | ♣Q | = | 90 | 67% | 3♥ | S | ♦5 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 4♥ | W | ♣Q | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | E | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 1NT | E | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| 22 | 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs NEMESIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34250) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | NEMESIS | |
| 21 | 1NT | E | ♣K | +1 | 120 | 73% | 1NT | E | ♣K | +1 | 120 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | W | ♣2 | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 73% | ||||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 34251) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 21 | 4♥x | N | ♦A | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2♦ | E | ♣K | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | ♠J | -1 | 100 | 87% | 4♥ | E | ♠J | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 4♥x | N | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 67% | ||||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs PACIFIC 1 : 3 VP (match 34252) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | PACIFIC | |
| 21 | 1NT | E | ♣K | +1 | 120 | 73% | 2♠ | E | ♦9 | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | E | ♠J | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 22 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs BELL 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34253) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | BELL | |
| 21 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| 22 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|