Round 6 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 6 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRUNET | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BRENO | FRANCE SENIORS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | NONAME | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | POLAND | CUNEO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | MARILL | LUPO VELOCE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | NEMESIS | 3 | 1 | 2.50 | 1.50 | protocol → |
| 7 | BYE | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 8 | BELL | PACIFIC | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 6↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 6 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R6 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 23.43 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 2 | BELL | 20.11 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 3 | FRANCE SENIORS | 19.11 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 4 | BRENO | 18.97 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 5 | POLAND | 18.83 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 6 | NEMESIS | 18.50 | 1.50 | 6 |
| 7 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 18.19 | 2.50 | 6 |
| 8 | PACIFIC | 16.14 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 9 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 14.97 | 2.40 | 6 |
| 10 | CUNEO | 14.86 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 11 | BRUNET | 14.14 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 12 | NONAME | 13.29 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 13 | MARILL | 11.86 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 11.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 9.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 6 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R6 | BAM% |
|---|
BRUNET vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34254) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | HARRIS | |
| 23 | 2♠ | W | ♥Q | = | 110 | 53% | 2♠ | W | ♥Q | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 24 | 6NT | E | ♣7 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 6NT | W | ♦5 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 24 | 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs FRANCE SENIORS 0 : 4 VP (match 34255) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 23 | 2♠ | E | ♥Q | = | 110 | 53% | 3♠ | W | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 24 | 6NT | E | ♠4 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 6NT | W | ♦6 | = | 990 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 100% | ||||
| 24 | 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | W | = | 990 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs NONAME 2 : 2 VP (match 34256) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | NONAME | |
| 23 | 2♠ | W | ♥Q | = | 110 | 53% | 1♠ | E | ♦2 | +1 | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 24 | 6NT | W | ♠7 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 6NT | E | ♦2 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1♠ | E | +1 | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 24 | 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs CUNEO 2 : 2 VP (match 34257) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | CUNEO | |
| 23 | 2♠ | W | ♥Q | = | 110 | 53% | 2♦ | E | ♥Q | +1 | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 24 | 6NT | E | ♠7 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 6NT | E | ♦8 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♦ | E | +1 | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 24 | 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs LUPO VELOCE 1 : 3 VP (match 34258) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 23 | 2♠ | W | ♥Q | = | 110 | 53% | 2♠ | W | ♥Q | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 24 | 7NT | W | ♦5 | = | 1520 | 100% | 6NT | W | ♠7 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 24 | 7NT | W | = | 1520 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs NEMESIS 2.5 : 1.5 VP (match 34259) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | NEMESIS | |
| 23 | 2♠ | W | ♥Q | = | 110 | 53% | 3♥ | N | ♠A | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 24 | 6NT | W | ♦5 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 6NT | W | ♥2 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | -3 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| 24 | 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34260) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 23 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 24 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS+1.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| 24 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs PACIFIC 3 : 1 VP (match 34261) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | PACIFIC | |
| 23 | 2♠ | W | ♥Q | = | 110 | 53% | 3♥ | N | ♠A | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 24 | 6NT | W | ♠9 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 6NT | E | ♠6 | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 23 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| 24 | 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|