Round 12 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 12 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BYE | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 2 | BELL | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | PACIFIC | MARILL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | POLAND | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | NEMESIS | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | LUPO VELOCE | BRENO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | CUNEO | BRUNET | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | NONAME | FRANCE SENIORS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 12↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 12 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R12 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 40.83 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 2 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 34.19 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 3 | NEMESIS | 30.50 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 4 | POLAND | 29.83 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 5 | FRANCE SENIORS | 29.11 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 6 | BRENO | 28.97 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 6 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 28.97 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 8 | CUNEO | 28.86 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 9 | PACIFIC | 28.14 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 10 | BELL | 28.11 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 11 | NONAME | 26.69 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 12 | MARILL | 26.26 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 13 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 22.40 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 14 | BRUNET | 21.54 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 20.40 | 2.40 | 12 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 12 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R12 | BAM% |
|---|
BYE vs HARRIS 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34302) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | HARRIS | |
| 3 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS+1.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| 4 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 1 : 3 VP (match 34303) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 3 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | = | 620 | 53% | 3NT | W | ♣5 | = | 600 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 4♠ | E | ♠7 | = | 620 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♠2 | = | 620 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 67% | ||||
| 4 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs MARILL 0 : 4 VP (match 34304) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | MARILL | |
| 3 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 80% | 2♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 3NT | E | ♦4 | +2 | 660 | 100% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | = | 620 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 80% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs POLAND 3 : 1 VP (match 34305) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | POLAND | |
| 3 | 4♥ | E | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 80% | 5♣x | N | ♦5 | -4 | 800 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 3NT | E | ♣2 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 3NT | E | ♦2 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-1.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | N | -4 | 800 | 93% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 34306) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 3 | 3♥ | W | ♣A | +2 | 200 | 73% | 4♥ | E | ♥6 | = | 620 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 3NT | E | ♣6 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 4♠ | E | ♥6 | = | 620 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3♥ | W | +2 | 200 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 53% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs BRENO 2 : 2 VP (match 34307) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | BRENO | |
| 3 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | = | 620 | 53% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | = | 620 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 3NT | E | ♣J | +1 | 630 | 80% | 3NT | E | ♣J | +1 | 630 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 53% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs BRUNET 3 : 1 VP (match 34308) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | BRUNET | |
| 3 | 4♥ | W | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 100% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 4♠ | E | ♠7 | = | 620 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♠3 | = | 620 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 80% | ||||
| 4 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs FRANCE SENIORS 3 : 1 VP (match 34309) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 3 | 4♥ | E | ♦5 | = | 620 | 53% | 5♣x | N | ♠A | -7 | 1700 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 4♠ | E | ♦5 | = | 620 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | = | 620 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | N | -7 | 1700 | 100% | ||||
| 4 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|