Round 14 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 14 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PACIFIC | HARRIS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | BELL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | NEMESIS | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | LUPO VELOCE | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CUNEO | MARILL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | NONAME | POLAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | FRANCE SENIORS | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BRUNET | BRENO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 14↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 14 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R14 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 41.83 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 2 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 40.19 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 3 | NEMESIS | 36.90 | 2.40 | 14 |
| 4 | POLAND | 34.83 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 5 | BELL | 34.11 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 6 | BRENO | 33.97 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 7 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 32.97 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 8 | FRANCE SENIORS | 32.11 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 9 | CUNEO | 31.86 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 10 | NONAME | 30.69 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 11 | PACIFIC | 30.54 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 12 | MARILL | 29.26 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 13 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 26.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 14 | BRUNET | 25.54 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 24.40 | 4.00 | 14 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 14 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R14 | BAM% |
|---|
PACIFIC vs HARRIS 0 : 4 VP (match 34318) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | HARRIS | |
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♣2 | +1 | 630 | 67% | 4♠ | E | ♣3 | = | 620 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♣ | N | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 60% | 3NT | W | ♣8 | -4 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 4♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -4 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs BELL 2 : 2 VP (match 34319) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | BELL | |
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♣7 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 3NT | E | ♣8 | +1 | 630 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♦x | E | ♣K | +1 | 570 | 100% | 5♦ | E | ♣K | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 67% | ||||
| 8 | 3♦x | E | +1 | 570 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 34320) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | BYE | |
| 7 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 70% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 50% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 50% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 70% | ||||
| 8 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 50% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 0 : 4 VP (match 34321) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 7 | 4♥ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 650 | 93% | 3NT | W | ♣7 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♦x | E | ♣K | = | 510 | 93% | 3♦ | E | ♣K | = | 110 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 8 | 4♦x | E | = | 510 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs MARILL 1 : 3 VP (match 34322) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | MARILL | |
| 7 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 93% | 3NT | W | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | ♣K | +1 | 130 | 77% | 4♦ | E | ♣K | = | 130 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 67% | ||||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs POLAND 2 : 2 VP (match 34323) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | POLAND | |
| 7 | 3♦ | E | ♣6 | +2 | 150 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 5♣x | N | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 87% | 4♠ | W | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 93% | ||||
| 8 | 5♣x | N | -2 | 300 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 34324) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 67% | 3NT | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 5♦x | E | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3NT | E | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 8 | 5♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs BRENO 1 : 3 VP (match 34325) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | BRENO | |
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 1NTx | W | ♣7 | -2 | 300 | 97% | 5♦x | E | ♣K | -2 | 300 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+1.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 8 | 1NTx | W | -2 | 300 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦x | E | -2 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|