Round 19 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 19 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRUNET | LUPO VELOCE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | NONAME | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | HARRIS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BELL | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | MARILL | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | POLAND | CUNEO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | PACIFIC | NEMESIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BRENO | FRANCE SENIORS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 19↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 19 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R19 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 51.23 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 2 | BELL | 49.51 | 2.40 | 19 |
| 3 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 49.19 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 4 | POLAND | 46.83 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 5 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 44.37 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 6 | NONAME | 44.09 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 7 | NEMESIS | 43.10 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 8 | BRENO | 42.77 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 9 | FRANCE SENIORS | 42.11 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 10 | MARILL | 39.06 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 11 | PACIFIC | 38.74 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 12 | CUNEO | 38.26 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 37.54 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 35.40 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 14 | HARRIS | 35.40 | 4.00 | 19 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 19 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R19 | BAM% |
|---|
BRUNET vs LUPO VELOCE 3 : 1 VP (match 34655) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 21 | 4♥ | S | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 77% | 4♥ | S | ♠6 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 4♦ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 150 | 93% | 3♦ | E | ♥7 | +2 | 150 | 93% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS-1.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| 22 | 4♦ | E | +1 | 150 | 93% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs NONAME 3 : 1 VP (match 34656) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | NONAME | |
| 21 | 3NT | N | ♠10 | = | 600 | 53% | 4♥x | S | ♠6 | -1 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 3NT | E | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | S | -1 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| 22 | 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs HARRIS 0 : 4 VP (match 34657) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | HARRIS | |
| 21 | 3NT | S | ♠10 | = | 600 | 53% | 3NT | N | ♠10 | +1 | 630 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 4♦ | E | ♠A | +1 | 150 | 93% | 3NT | E | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 3NT | S | = | 600 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 93% | ||||
| 22 | 4♦ | E | +1 | 150 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 34658) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | BYE | |
| 21 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 77% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| 22 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 3 : 1 VP (match 34659) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 21 | 3NT | N | ♦5 | +2 | 660 | 100% | 3NT | N | ♦9 | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 3NT | W | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 22 | 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs CUNEO 2 : 2 VP (match 34660) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | CUNEO | |
| 21 | 4♥ | N | ♣2 | = | 620 | 77% | 4♥ | N | ♠10 | = | 620 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | 3NT | E | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 3NT | E | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 77% | ||||
| 22 | 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs NEMESIS 3 : 1 VP (match 34661) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | NEMESIS | |
| 21 | 3NT | N | ♦5 | = | 600 | 53% | 4♥ | S | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 3NT | W | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| 22 | 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs FRANCE SENIORS 2 : 2 VP (match 34662) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 21 | 4♥ | S | ♣5 | = | 620 | 77% | 4♥ | S | ♣5 | = | 620 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | 3NT | W | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 77% | ||||
| 22 | 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|