Round 22 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 22 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | LUPO VELOCE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | MARILL | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | POLAND | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | PACIFIC | BRUNET | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BRENO | NONAME | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | FRANCE SENIORS | HARRIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | NEMESIS | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CUNEO | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 22↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 22 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R22 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | 59.51 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | 56.23 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 3 | POLAND | 55.23 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 4 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 54.19 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 5 | FRANCE SENIORS | 51.11 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 6 | NONAME | 50.09 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 7 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 48.37 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 8 | BRENO | 48.17 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 9 | NEMESIS | 47.50 | 2.40 | 22 |
| 10 | MARILL | 47.06 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 11 | CUNEO | 45.26 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 12 | PACIFIC | 43.74 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 43.54 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 41.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 37.40 | 0.00 | 22 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 22 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R22 | BAM% |
|---|
BELL vs LUPO VELOCE 4 : 0 VP (match 34679) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 27 | 4♥ | W | ♣4 | = | 420 | 60% | 4♠x | S | ♠5 | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 1NT | W | ♠3 | = | 90 | 83% | 3♠x | N | ♥4 | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-2.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -4 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| 28 | 1NT | W | = | 90 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | N | -2 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 34680) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 27 | 2NT | E | ♠2 | = | 120 | 67% | 3♠ | N | ♥6 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3NT | W | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 53% | 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2NT | E | = | 120 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 3 : 1 VP (match 34681) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 27 | 4♥ | E | ♦2 | = | 420 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♦7 | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 3NT | E | ♥6 | -3 | 150 | 83% | 3NT | E | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | E | -3 | 150 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs BRUNET 1 : 3 VP (match 34682) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | BRUNET | |
| 27 | 4♥ | W | ♦8 | = | 420 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♦8 | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 1NT | W | ♠7 | = | 90 | 83% | 3NT | E | ♣A | -4 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 28 | 1NT | W | = | 90 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -4 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs NONAME 0 : 4 VP (match 34683) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | NONAME | |
| 27 | 4♥x | W | ♦8 | = | 590 | 93% | 4♥ | W | ♦8 | = | 420 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3NT | E | ♥6 | -2 | 100 | 70% | 3NT | E | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 4♥x | W | = | 590 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -3 | 150 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs HARRIS 4 : 0 VP (match 34684) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | HARRIS | |
| 27 | 4♥ | W | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 4♠x | N | ♥K | -3 | 500 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3NT | E | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2♣ | E | ♦4 | = | 90 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 87% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 2♣ | E | = | 90 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 34685) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | BYE | |
| 27 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 90% | ||||
| 28 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 4 : 0 VP (match 34686) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 27 | 3♠ | S | ♣5 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 4♥ | W | ♦8 | = | 420 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2♠x | N | ♥4 | = | 670 | 100% | 3NT | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 28 | 2♠x | N | = | 670 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|