Round 28 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 28 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEMESIS | LUPO VELOCE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CUNEO | FRANCE SENIORS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BRENO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BYE | PACIFIC | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 5 | HARRIS | POLAND | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | NONAME | MARILL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | BRUNET | BELL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 28↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 28 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R28 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | 72.51 | 4.00 | 28 |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | 67.23 | 1.00 | 28 |
| 3 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 66.59 | 3.00 | 28 |
| 4 | POLAND | 66.23 | 4.00 | 28 |
| 5 | NEMESIS | 64.50 | 3.00 | 28 |
| 6 | FRANCE SENIORS | 63.91 | 2.00 | 28 |
| 7 | NONAME | 62.09 | 0.00 | 28 |
| 8 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 61.37 | 4.00 | 28 |
| 9 | MARILL | 60.46 | 4.00 | 28 |
| 10 | PACIFIC | 60.34 | 2.40 | 28 |
| 11 | CUNEO | 59.26 | 2.00 | 28 |
| 12 | BRENO | 56.17 | 1.00 | 28 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 53.94 | 0.00 | 28 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 52.80 | 0.00 | 28 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 43.40 | 0.00 | 28 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 28 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R28 | BAM% |
|---|
NEMESIS vs LUPO VELOCE 3 : 1 VP (match 34727) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 9 | 4♣ | E | ♦6 | = | 130 | 70% | 4♥ | E | ♠K | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 1NT | N | ♦6 | = | 90 | 60% | 1NT | N | ♦4 | = | 90 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♣ | E | = | 130 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 87% | ||||
| 10 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs FRANCE SENIORS 2 : 2 VP (match 34728) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 9 | 4♣x | E | ♥Q | = | 710 | 93% | 4♠x | N | ♦9 | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 2NT | S | ♣5 | = | 120 | 83% | 1NT | N | ♦2 | = | 90 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♣x | E | = | 710 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 57% | ||||
| 10 | 2NT | S | = | 120 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs BRENO 3 : 1 VP (match 34729) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BRENO | |
| 9 | 5♣ | E | ♠K | = | 600 | 80% | 6♠x | N | ♦9 | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 1NT | S | ♣5 | +1 | 120 | 83% | 2NT | S | ♣4 | = | 120 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 6♠x | N | -4 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| 10 | 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs PACIFIC 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34730) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | PACIFIC | |
| 9 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 70% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 70% | ||||
| 10 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs POLAND 0 : 4 VP (match 34731) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | POLAND | |
| 9 | 4♠ | N | ♦5 | -2 | 100 | 57% | 3♠ | S | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 2♠ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 140 | 100% | 1NT | N | ♦3 | +1 | 120 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | ||||
| 10 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs MARILL 0 : 4 VP (match 34732) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | MARILL | |
| 9 | 5♣ | E | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 83% | 3NT | E | ♥Q | -3 | 300 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 1NT | S | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2♥ | E | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -3 | 300 | 93% | ||||
| 10 | 1NT | S | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs BELL 0 : 4 VP (match 34733) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | BELL | |
| 9 | 3♠ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 57% | 5♣ | E | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 1NT | N | ♦4 | = | 90 | 60% | 2♠ | W | ♠A | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 10 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | -3 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 4 : 0 VP (match 34734) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 9 | 2♠x | N | ♦9 | = | 470 | 100% | 4♣ | E | ♥J | = | 130 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 2♥ | W | ♣3 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 1NT | N | ♥6 | = | 90 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠x | N | = | 470 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | E | = | 130 | 70% | ||||
| 10 | 2♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|