Round 29 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 29 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CUNEO | LUPO VELOCE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | NEMESIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | BYE | FRANCE SENIORS | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 4 | HARRIS | BRENO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | NONAME | PACIFIC | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BRUNET | POLAND | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | MARILL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BELL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 29↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 29 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R29 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | 74.51 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 2 | LUPO VELOCE | 70.23 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 2 | POLAND | 70.23 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 4 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 69.59 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 5 | FRANCE SENIORS | 66.31 | 2.40 | 29 |
| 6 | NEMESIS | 65.50 | 1.00 | 29 |
| 7 | NONAME | 65.09 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 8 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 64.37 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 9 | MARILL | 61.46 | 1.00 | 29 |
| 10 | PACIFIC | 61.34 | 1.00 | 29 |
| 11 | CUNEO | 60.26 | 1.00 | 29 |
| 12 | BRENO | 58.17 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 13 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 54.80 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 14 | BRUNET | 53.94 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 45.40 | 2.00 | 29 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 29 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R29 | BAM% |
|---|
CUNEO vs LUPO VELOCE 1 : 3 VP (match 34735) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 11 | 3NT | W | ♠2 | +3 | 490 | 93% | 6NT | W | ♥2 | -5 | 250 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♠3 | = | 620 | 57% | 4♥ | N | ♥2 | = | 620 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | W | +3 | 490 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | W | -5 | 250 | 100% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs NEMESIS 3 : 1 VP (match 34736) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | NEMESIS | |
| 11 | 3NT | E | ♥3 | +3 | 490 | 93% | 3NT | E | — | +3 | 490 | 93% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♠2 | = | 620 | 57% | 4♠x | E | ♦2 | -3 | 500 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | E | +3 | 490 | 93% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | +3 | 490 | 93% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs FRANCE SENIORS 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34737) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 11 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs BRENO 2 : 2 VP (match 34738) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | BRENO | |
| 11 | 3NT | W | ♠3 | +1 | 430 | 70% | 3NT | W | ♦5 | +2 | 460 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠x | W | ♥K | -3 | 500 | 77% | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 620 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 60% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠x | W | -3 | 500 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs PACIFIC 3 : 1 VP (match 34739) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | PACIFIC | |
| 11 | 3NT | W | ♠5 | +1 | 430 | 70% | 3NT | E | ♥6 | +2 | 460 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 620 | 57% | 4♥ | N | ♣6 | = | 620 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 60% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs POLAND 0 : 4 VP (match 34740) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | POLAND | |
| 11 | 3NT | W | ♥7 | +2 | 460 | 60% | 6NT | W | ♥4 | -1 | 50 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♠x | W | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 87% | 4♠x | E | ♦A | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+1.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | W | -1 | 50 | 93% | ||||
| 12 | 3♠x | W | -2 | 300 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | E | -4 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs MARILL 3 : 1 VP (match 34741) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | MARILL | |
| 11 | 3NT | E | ♥7 | +2 | 460 | 60% | 3NT | W | ♥7 | +2 | 460 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♥10 | +2 | 680 | 93% | 4♥ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 60% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs BELL 2 : 2 VP (match 34742) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BELL | |
| 11 | 3NT | W | ♦4 | +2 | 460 | 60% | 3NT | E | ♥5 | +2 | 460 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | ♠K | = | 620 | 57% | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 620 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 60% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|