Round 8 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 8 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | POLAND | BRENO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | MARILL | BRUNET | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | FRANCE SENIORS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BYE | NONAME | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 6 | BELL | CUNEO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | PACIFIC | LUPO VELOCE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | NEMESIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 8↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 8 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R8 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 29.83 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 2 | BELL | 23.11 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 3 | BRENO | 22.97 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 4 | POLAND | 22.83 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 5 | NEMESIS | 22.50 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 6 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 22.19 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 7 | FRANCE SENIORS | 21.11 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 8 | CUNEO | 20.86 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 9 | PACIFIC | 19.14 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 10 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 18.97 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 11 | NONAME | 18.69 | 2.40 | 8 |
| 12 | BRUNET | 16.14 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 13 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 16.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 14 | MARILL | 15.86 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 13.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 8 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R8 | BAM% |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34270) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | HARRIS | |
| 27 | 2♠ | E | ♥Q | = | 110 | 80% | 2♠ | E | ♥3 | = | 110 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 3NT | W | ♠5 | +1 | 430 | 77% | 3NT | W | ♠5 | +1 | 430 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs BRENO 2 : 2 VP (match 34271) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | BRENO | |
| 27 | 2♥ | S | ♠5 | = | 110 | 93% | 2♠ | W | ♣A | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3NT | E | ♠4 | +2 | 460 | 60% | 3NT | W | ♣6 | +1 | 430 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs BRUNET 3 : 1 VP (match 34272) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | BRUNET | |
| 27 | 2♠ | E | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2♠x | E | ♣7 | = | 470 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♥ | W | ♠J | +2 | 480 | 87% | 4♥ | W | ♠J | +2 | 480 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 2♠x | E | = | 470 | 100% | ||||
| 28 | 4♥ | W | +2 | 480 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +2 | 480 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs FRANCE SENIORS 4 : 0 VP (match 34273) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 27 | 3♠ | E | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2♠ | E | ♣8 | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3NT | W | ♣10 | +1 | 430 | 77% | 3NT | W | ♣2 | +2 | 460 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs NONAME 0 : 2.4 VP (match 34274) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | NONAME | |
| 27 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | ||||
| 28 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs CUNEO 2 : 2 VP (match 34275) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | CUNEO | |
| 27 | 3♦ | W | ♠10 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 3♠ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 4♥ | W | ♠J | +2 | 480 | 87% | 4♥ | E | ♠J | +2 | 480 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| 28 | 4♥ | W | +2 | 480 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 480 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs LUPO VELOCE 0 : 4 VP (match 34276) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 27 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | = | 110 | 80% | 3♣x | N | ♥A | = | 470 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3NT | W | ♠J | +2 | 460 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♠J | +1 | 450 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 3♣x | N | = | 470 | 100% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs NEMESIS 3 : 1 VP (match 34277) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | NEMESIS | |
| 27 | 3♠ | E | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 3♠ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 4♥ | W | ♣10 | +1 | 450 | 57% | 4♥ | W | ♦J | +2 | 480 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| 28 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +2 | 480 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|